My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 01-07-1981
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1981
>
PRECA 01-07-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 4:16:33 AM
Creation date
3/14/2007 5:38:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3) Physically integrated development. A single master <br />developer can coordinate the .location, size, orientation, <br />and relationship between individual buildings downtown <br />in a way which would be very diffi-cult with several <br />independent individual developers. Orientation of their <br />buildings to one another, public spaces and pedestrian <br />.connections can be done very easily. <br />4) Financial capabilities. A major development firm has <br />the financial capabilities to insure implementation <br />of the proposed projects which smaller developers would <br />not have. <br />5) Development and construction management experience. A <br />Major developer has the experience and technical skills <br />necessary to implement a project of this complexity. <br />Both of the organizations proposing to be exlusive master <br />developers for the downtown are different from the majority of <br />the development proposals received in that they are interested <br />in developing property in New Brighton which they would not <br />occupy themselves. They are both interested in developing <br />propoerty which they would either sell or lease to other operations. <br />As a result they have expressed a willingness to work with any of <br />the other l4 organizations which made proposals. Both organizations <br />have stated they would start expending funds for meeting with the <br />14 other organizations as soon as they are .named the exclusive <br />developer. They would work to meet their development needs and <br />accommodate them downtown by providing them space for rent, land <br />on which they could build, or building space which they could <br />purchase. <br />The obvious benefits to the community from choosing a single <br />master developer to carry out the downtown redevelopment plan and <br />the willingness of the potential master developers to accommodate <br />the needs of the smaller proposed developments suggest that the <br />best course of action for the city to take would be to select a <br />master developer for the downtown redevelopment project. <br />The following discussions therefore, concentrate on describing <br />and evaluating the master developer proposals. <br />Summary of Master Developer Proposals <br />The Kraus-Anderson and Commercial Guarantee Fund proposals are <br />very similar in nature.. Each calls for substantial redevelopment <br />of the downtown development district with a mixture of different <br />land uses. In both cases a major hotel is proposed as well as <br />substantial office space, retail space, and a restaurant. The <br />Commercial Guarantee Fund porposal also includes a proposal for <br />an elderly housing project of 65,000 to 75,000 square feet. <br />Both developers have expressed eagerness in entering into a Joint <br />Planning Agreement with the City and would anticipate beginning <br />construction within six (6) to nine (9} months of entering into <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.