My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 07-15-1981
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1981
>
PRECM 07-15-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 12:49:06 PM
Creation date
3/15/2007 11:42:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 15, 1981 Park Board Minutes <br />Page 7 <br />Gunderman asked how Polzak will be working with Don Lais, City <br />Attorney. <br />Polzak said they will try to resolve it practically. <br />Pat Cobb, 1700 19A St. N.W., as a lay person looking at the <br />statement of understanding is putting the horse before the cart. <br />It leaves open alot for the County. Don't have full understanding <br />but it looks like New Brighton may be committed to elements that <br />may never have control. Statment of Understanding is basically <br />to lay down direction. In the joint powers agreement, the City <br />is being tied down to a large portion of maintenance and police <br />which could be a large amount. At the last meeting he understood <br />the City would be reimbursed but by this document, no. Police and <br />beach will be a large portion of the maintenance costs. City will <br />be deeding property to the County for terms unknow and park de- <br />velopment unknown. Jumping into commitment that New Brighton <br />should not be committed to at this time. Ramsey County has no <br />commitment. We provide police and fire protection and operate <br />the beach and the County does nothing. <br />Gunderman said that's basically what the master plan will do. <br />We can't develop the master plan with a ghost. <br />Cobb stated he accepts the Statement of Understanding where <br />hopefully things will be in good faith, but when the joint <br />powers agreement is signed the City is committing itself. <br />Anderson said that it is confusing. The joint powers agreement. <br />commits the City to proceed to develop the master plan for the <br />City and County to adopt. But unless there is agreement, there <br />is nothing. If we turn over land before master plan, nothing can <br />be done. Most of what Mr. Polzak said will be addressed in the <br />master plan. Mr. Polzak did not address the master plan - don't <br />know if that was on purpose. The City is not rushing into this, <br />Anderson said he would also like to address the $70,000 local <br />share. $750,000 is likely to be reimbursed to the City of New <br />Brighton. Don't know where Polzak got is figure of $70,000. <br />When master plan is developed, then yes, we want to be sure <br />but we have to take a step now. <br />Cobb said the Statement of Understanding is fine. The joint <br />powers agreement is specific. The City is responsible and the <br />County is not committed. <br />Anderson said on the 1984 termination date, it will be renegotiated. <br />Master plan.will not terminate. <br />Cobb stated he would like the July 1st minutes to be corrected <br />stating that he had asked for a copy of the joint powers agreement <br />and never received one. Said he was told staff would mail him one <br />but he never received it. <br />Anderson apologized for the mistake. He understood that Cobb was <br />going to pick up the copy.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.