My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 07-01-1981
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1981
>
PRECM 07-01-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 4:12:29 AM
Creation date
3/15/2007 11:51:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 1, 1981 Park Board Minutes <br />Page 11 <br />• Dahl asked what would happen if the County deviates from the <br />plan 10 years after it was drawn up. How long is the master <br />plan in effect? <br />Anderson said the master plan could not be changed without the <br />three-party consent. All parties have to agree. There is <br />` no expiration date on master plan. <br />Carlson asked that in 10 years from now if Ramsey County wants <br />to change after everything has been developed, isthere a recourse? <br />Anderson again said that we still have to have all three approvals. <br />Schmidt said that it may be good to have some kind of legal re- <br />course. It°s better to add it if there is a default to have the <br />buy-out provision. It never hurts to negotiate the clause. <br />Carlson said that the City Attorney should word the buy-back option <br />and if feasible, the figure of reimbursement to the City would be <br />at today's figure. <br />Carlson said he would like this renegotiated if there is another <br />joint powers agreement. It could go on for 100 years if .necessary, <br />Gunderman stated he wants to see the motion open ended. <br />. ~ Amendment by Carlson, seconded by Olson, that the Park Board requests <br />that the City Attorney be directed to draft the language for the <br />joint powers agreement that provides for the City to regain control <br />over the Park in the event the County fails to perform its responsi- <br />bilities for providing a "base" level of service whether it is <br />through a lease by City to County with default termination provision, <br />or buy-back provision by City from County, or some other legal form <br />to meet the intent for City control over the park if the County <br />defaults. Amendment passed. <br />Van Hatten stated he was uncomfortable with the 1984 date. <br />Dahl said that is a time to renegotiate, it is not an end, it is <br />a check point. <br />Van Hatten said he would like to remove number 7. It says what <br />we do is null and void. <br />Anderson said that by law a joint powers agreement-must have an <br />expiration date. <br />Anderson said that both Ramsey County and Met Council want the <br />1984 date in for different reasons. Ramsey County wants-to make <br />sure they have maintenance and operation money available. Met <br />Council has a 5 year policy plan and the 1984 date is the end of <br />the five years. It is not the intention of either party to <br />terminate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.