My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 07-01-1981
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1981
>
PRECM 07-01-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 4:12:29 AM
Creation date
3/15/2007 11:51:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 1, 1981 Park Board Minutes <br />Page 12 <br />Amendment by Johnson, seconded by Van Hatten, that the first <br />sentence in number seven be changed to have the word "terminate." <br />replaced with the words "shall be renegotiated" and in the fourtY• <br />line the words "unless the" be replaced with "at which time this" <br />and the word "is" be replaced with the words "will be", and delete <br />the last sentence. <br />Van Hatten did not like the wording of number 7 where it referred <br />to the December 31, 1981 date. <br />Amendment by Van Hatten, to change the word "upon" to "after" in <br />the first sentence of number 7. Amendment failed for lack of <br />second. <br />Original amendment passed. Original motion passed. <br />Anderson said the petition and letter should be officially accepted <br />by the Park Board. <br />Motion by Dahl, seconded by Carlson, to accept the letter and <br />petition from the Long Lake Improvement Association. Motion passed. <br />Gunderman asked what the committee should look like. <br />Dahl said two Park Board members, two Long Lake residents, and <br />two non-Long Lake residents. Need a nucleus but don't want to <br />have it too big. Each group should have a way to get the infor- <br />mation back to the Park Board. • <br />Van Hatten asked what was the purpose of the group. <br />Gunderman said to get input from the residents. <br />Carlson suggested having at least one person from the original <br />groups formed earlier. <br />Anderson said the groups were from the Long Lake surface use <br />meetings. <br />Carlson said he had forgotten that. <br />Gunderman said one group <br />of Long Lake Improvement <br />resident and previous gr~ <br />group. <br />Johnson suggested having <br />Women Voters represented <br />could be Pat Commers and Marv Cook <br />Association and Jim Borgstrom, a <br />pup member for the Long Lake surface <br />organizations such as the League of <br />and perhaps the Jaycees. <br />Dahl asked how to go about identifying these people. <br />Anderson stated that some of the organizations don't always have <br />New Brighton boundaries and there are so many, where would we • <br />stop. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.