Laserfiche WebLink
NEW BRIGHTON PARK BOARD <br />h'tINt~TES <br />' APRIL 1, 1981 <br />.. • <br />The meeting was called to order at=7:30 p.m. by Chairperson Gunderman. <br />II. All members were present". <br />III'. Minutes of March 3, 1981 meeting were approved as submitted.. <br />IV. Correspondence <br />A. Council Report <br />Schmidt explained-that the 'Council had approved the funding for <br />clean up at Long Lake. The Council also approved the concept plan <br />and ;the park name - Meadow Wood. Schmidt also informed the Park <br />Board that the new City Manager had been hued. His name is Jim <br />Fornell from St. Anthony. ~He will begin May\18th.` <br />,Anderson also mentioned that the Council did approve the joint <br />Forester position with Mounds View; 60~-New Brighton, 40~ Mounds <br />View. Anderson said he is 'very happy because: now we can keep a <br />good man who would have otherwise been through this year.. He will <br />spend 3 days in New Brighton and 2 days in Mounds View. <br />New Business <br />~. <br />A. Wai'burn Industrial Park Preliminary Plate <br />The Board of Review was present. at the Park Board meeting to dis <br />-cuss with the Park Board and. the applicant, Dick Bury, the pre.- <br />liminary plat. Dale Hebeisen o'f Hult..and Associates was also present. <br />Gunderman stated tr7alburn had been discussed at the last meeting.. <br />Archer passed around a new plan~for.review. Archer stated the <br />differences were the street which now ,.goes through the old gas station <br />and the outlot configuration. Archer expressed concern with integratin <br />Beissweriger's.with this plod. There will be~no loading parking; etc. <br />in the front yard. Alignment is forcing development toward the park. <br />Parcel #3 has not yet .been considered. There are a number of issues <br />that are still missing. Because of this, the lateness, change of <br />street, 'etc. Archer .requested that t1~is be considered a concept ds- <br />c-ussion only. ` <br />Gunderman commented that parcels #2 &.i#3 were being looked at for <br />secondary access. City is working with Ramsey County for access but. <br />this ~is one way to get to the park without Ramsey County. <br />A Board of Review member asked if thefunds far the,-park Mere just <br />for Long`Lake or for both Long Lake and Rush Lake. <br />Gunderman responded for both}. The battle with Ramsey County is <br />operation and maintenance.. There was a°meeting last night• trying <br />to break the log jam. It .would be a tremendous advantage to provide <br />a second access. <br />