Laserfiche WebLink
February .3, 1981 Park Board Minutes <br />Page 5 <br />Dahl thought maybe a "yes",or "no" would be appropriate. <br />Johnson noticed there are no trails. Should it be .noted some- <br />where that this is .the case. <br />Anderson said there:was one trail at Sunny Square and that <br />maybe the heading "trails".should be added as more will eventually <br />be added. <br />Van Hatten suggested adding the acres to the parks on the <br />facilities and parks page. That way he's able to see how the <br />park is being utilized as far as its acreage is concerned. <br />After Park Board discussion as to where. the information should <br />be added, it was decided it would be added to the inventory <br />Page• <br />Anderson commented that the next pages came intact from the <br />City's Comprehensive Plan which was .officially adopted at the <br />last Council meeting. Anderson said he would like to stay with <br />the same format .but. if there was concern with language, it <br />could be changed. The Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan <br />will become an adendum to the City's Comprehensive Park Plan. <br />Anderson commented that the Mayor stated it would be possible <br />to make changes in the City Plan. before it goes to Metro <br />Council. Schmidt said that was correct. <br />Dahl asked how this related to the Park Board's goals and <br />objectives. <br />Anderson said these have to be reconciled. The Board requested <br />extensive reworking o.f this section. <br />Johnson requested that: under "Existing Conditions and Needs" <br />in the third paragraph, the words "the elementary" be .deleted. <br />He would like it to apply. to all schools. Park Board :.::agreed. <br />Carlson felt. that the set of criteria that was discussed at <br />previous. meetings regarding minimum park size, etc. is missing. <br />Dahl. felt .that. the goals stated were old. .The Park Board's <br />intention. is to restate some goals in terms of what we have <br />in .the community. at the present. <br />Carlson and Dahl agreed that what-was .done previously by Gunderman <br />regarding philosophy should be reflected in this section. <br />Anderson. responded that-the reason it wasn't was because it was <br />.his understanding .that it was never officially. adopted. <br />Dahl said she understood that. things would be put. in one at a <br />time during the work on the Comprehensive Plan <br />Carlson was concerned with a statement under the "Implementation" <br />section referring to tax forfeited land. Does the Park Board <br />want that in the plan? <br />