My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 05-07-1980
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1980
>
PRECA 05-07-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:59:43 AM
Creation date
3/15/2007 4:15:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.. <br />for breakdocan. Moreover, is it practical to believe that <br />_• all efforts could be lost=if the cancellation provision <br />is invoked by either ;party?. <br />Financially, with levy lz~its ~ reality, the means will.. <br />not be these to meet thisobligation. The Gity is at its <br />levy limit, and a 6~ increase 'in the .levy limit base is <br />currently allowing a General Fund budget ncrease'of <br />.around $100,QOQ per yeax', With nan tax non State aid <br />revenues fairly constant, `the City's General Fund will be <br />fortunate to fund current-services in,1~~Q unless anew <br />revenue. source can be found. We must discourage substantial <br />operating commitments which ..could be assumed by others <br />such as the Long Lake regional park, <br />I have. same recommendations based on my thoughts and <br />concerns explained above. Realizing that the issue is <br />sensitive 1 don't wish to pubTic7y refute the proposed <br />joint powers agreement. which has been drafted with: City <br />staff input. Nor do I have a -feel foal how adamant- the <br />City Council is about sharing responsiblities fox the' <br />park. However, if the City Council does have any doubts <br />about a joint sharing for the park, I believe that we <br />must communicate those to the County staff prior to <br />action by the County Boaxd so we dan't embarrass either <br />their staff, our staff, their Soard, or you by publicly <br />challenging an agreement that appeared to have been prepared <br />to the form requested by the parta,es. <br />Recommendation <br />1. That the City Council take a preliminary position on <br />the joint City - County Long Lake Regional Park and <br />communicate that to ..the County staff. <br />2. That the following suggestions be considered by the <br />City Council: <br />a) To suggest to County staff a lease of City of New <br />Brighton owned regional park property to Ramsey <br />County, and to recognize-that with Ramsey County <br />designated as the implementing agency, that they ' <br />do have primary responsiblity for development, <br />maintenance, and-the ultimate operation at the <br />Long Lake regional parka (It is understood by this <br />recommendation'-that the City would be able to input <br />the decision making process with the County throughout <br />the development stage and in regard to suggestions <br />as affects operation and maintenance.) <br />b) To encourage the County to contract with the City <br />for certain operating and maintenance,'and programming <br />activities, upon completion of the park. <br />~enn~.s y . a' `~ <br />City Manager- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.