My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 05-07-1980
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1980
>
PRECA 05-07-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:59:43 AM
Creation date
3/15/2007 4:15:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Report No. 79-44Q <br />'' .Tiny 2, 1979 <br />~; LONG LAKE REGIONAL, PARK <br />Apparently the Ramsey County Board of Commissioners will <br />soon`be entertaining a recommendation by their staff to <br />adopt a joint powers agreement with New Brighton for .the <br />joint operation of the Tang Lake regional park, The capital <br />cost and the operating cost of the park are proposed to <br />be shared between Ramsey County and the City of New Brighton <br />on a 75/25 cost shar~.ng basis. The grojeCted`operating <br />cost for the City of New Brighton for Phases I - VI from <br />1979 - 1984 is estimated at almost $87,OOU. The annual <br />cost of operation each year thereafter: not factored for <br />inflation, would be $3~,QQQ, 'This annual pperating cost <br />does not inlcude any anticipated cost for equipment capital <br />out-lay. The development cost for the park is to be funded <br />by the Metropolitan Council. <br />While Ramsey County is the implementing agency as designated <br />by the Metropolitan Council, it is due to New Brighton's <br />expressed interest in having some degree of control over. <br />the planning and operation of the proposed park-that is <br />leading the City to-also be a potential participant in the <br />ongoing operating, maintenance cost for the site.:-The <br />moment of decision for the City Council may soon be near <br />relative to formally deciding the level of commitment that <br />the City of New Brighton in fact wants to assume for the <br />proposed park. The County Board may receive their staff <br />recommendation July 16th.: _ <br />I have great concern, and I have detected concern among <br />members of the City Council about the City's maintenance <br />obligation-for parks in general, for the possible City <br />maintenance Obligation which would accrue with the development <br />of Long Lake Park. Unless the City's cost obligation is <br />somehow met by a new revenue source, I believe that the <br />City will lac hard pressed to meet its obligation for <br />maintenance of the park in the `long run, I therefore <br />question the wisdom of the City assuming a Share of the <br />.operation and maintenance cost of the park when this <br />ongoing obligation could be shifted to the County as part <br />of their obligation for operating regional parks. <br />Philosophically I also have a problem with some joint sharing <br />arrangements, While on paper the lines of responsiblity <br />are delineated, in practice the lines become clouded and <br />communications seem to break down. The end result is poor <br />accountability and ultimately poor service tca the public. <br />Items. not covered by the initial resolution are to be <br />resolved by'"'negotiation", where there a.s always a potential <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.