My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 11-12-1980
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1980
>
PRECM 11-12-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:54:29 AM
Creation date
3/16/2007 7:45:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November l2, 1980 Park Board Minutes <br />Page 5 <br />Gunderman commented that who owns the park makes a great difference <br />in what will happen. Local control is very important to him. <br />Gunderman stated.-that- if the .City would police the area themselves, <br />we may possibly be able to go through legislature to become the <br />implementing agency .and get funds they would get. <br />Motion by Dahl, seconded. by Hogan, that no action be taken until <br />a proposal is received from the County Board. Motion passed. <br />Gunderman, Johnson naye. <br />Carlson said there are other alternatives if someone wanted to make <br />a second motion for .another plan as to what to do .with the property. <br />Dahl said-that people may prefer negotiations with the County staff <br />before it gets to the Board. <br />Anderson reminded. everyone there are only seven days to work with <br />this. <br />Carlson stated he supports Dahl's motion because we don't have <br />enough information or time to evaluate the proposal. <br />Johnson felt we should comment to Ramsey County staff there isn't <br />adequate levels of control. The way it is currently written, he <br />would not give up ownership.: <br />Dahl. asked what Ramsey County's disagreement is with the Manager <br />and Anderson. <br />Anderson stated mainly the language. The City would like stronger <br />language in-favor of the City. <br />C. 198.1-86 CIP <br />Anderson. said the City Manager,has gone through all the CIP - <br />Fire Hall, Liquor Store, etc.. He is showing the project. and source <br />of funding, ..Anderson said the Council will decide how much will be <br />used on the liquor store and fire hall and then.prioriti_ze fxom what` <br />is left. No one knows-what money will_be left for park projects. <br />Andersom went through and defined what each CIP project involved. <br />Dahl, suggested that Long Lake fencing be put at the bottom. <br />Gunderman-asked why. <br />Dahl stated Anderson said there are so,r~any questions on Long Lake <br />at this time and so much uncertainty as what is happening with. the <br />park that. he doesn't feel it is feasible at this .time. The money <br />is there if the County funds it but if not, he doesn't know where <br />the. money will come `from. <br />Grimshaw favored Hansen as #1 because he's afraid if it's not first, <br />it may be taken off completely. He favors Park Signing as #2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.