Laserfiche WebLink
x <br />e ~ ~ <br />AgINUTES OF SPECSAL PARK BOAF,D r~1EETIT~G (CONTINUED) Page 2 <br />~. The trail would be over used. <br />Responses Pao statistics exist to prove or disapprove this. <br />9. Litter and trash would be left on private property. <br />Responses Regular maintenance is best answer. <br />10. Residents would be liable for accidents on and near <br />the trail. <br />Response. riot on the trail'P however some liability exists <br />for trespassers. <br />lI. The trail mght.not be properly maintained. <br />Responses All intentions are that the trail would <br />be properly maintained. <br />12. Residents will lose their privacy. <br />Response: That would happen to a certain extent. <br />PARK EOARD COA7117ENTS AND ()UESTIOFIS <br />-Gunderman expressed concern that the trail would be of little <br />benefit to New Brighton residents. <br />~Grimshaw stated a preference for a trail that-could be <br />easily patrolled. <br />-Gunderman requested location of the trail's terminus. in <br />Fridley. <br />Response: An Anoka. County Park on the Mississippi River. <br />-Grimshaw asked whether Metro Council might fund development <br />of a rest area in Creekview Fark. <br />Response: It-could be included in-the funding request. <br />-Blomquist - If the N~ississippi route were selected, would <br />a bridge be installed over Rice Creek at Stinson Blvd.? <br />Response: Yes. <br />Ti~hat kind :of access would be developed into the north end <br />of Long Lake Fark? .~ <br />Response: Another bridge over the creek. <br />How wide would the trail'be? <br />Response: 8f t. trail, 4 ft. shoulder, 8 ft. landscaped. area. <br />