My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 01-11-1978
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1978
>
PRECM 01-11-1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:32:51 AM
Creation date
3/19/2007 11:46:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-6- <br />I'd like to ask .Maurie a couple of questions. Can you expand a. bit on <br />the, your comments on .the parts of the plan that relate to the overnight, <br />the camping portion and the concession stand. I know this is a question that <br />came up at some of the Park Board hearings , I think by perhaps explaining some <br />of the rationale and some of the specific elements elements of the plan <br />might clarify some of these questions. <br />MA OK The overnight camping, we're talking about restricting to groups such <br />as Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Campfire Girls, that kind of thing. Only closely <br />supervised groups. Well chaperoned, who have some kind of a tie in with the <br />Nature Center. We're envisioning at the site a. satellite Nature Center that <br />would be open oh somewhere between 8 and g months a year. It would not be open <br />during the winter time, but would be open during the summer, fall and probably <br />some of the springtime.. It could conceivably be a. church group or a school <br />group in addition to the other groups that I mentioned. earlier, but would be <br />very tightly controlled, very well supervised and my guess would be just right. <br />off the top of my head , and somebody may hold me to this someday,. but.. off the <br />top of my head that we .might be looking at oh 2,5 to 30~ utilization of that <br />site. The rest of the time it would be open for casual picnicking, people to <br />walk through, hike through, whatever. It would not be a heavily used area. But <br />it would be open most of the time just for normal picnicking. The concession <br />stand would be a p~.rt of the beach operation, would be realatively sma.ll,operation <br />a.nd would be designed primarily as a service to those people: who would use the <br />beach. We wouldn't get into anything fancy but would have something where <br />people who are swimming could stop and get something cold to drink, a bite to <br />eat that-would be the extent of it. <br />agree with <br />JS? Man I think I heard the City Attorney, tirezrth at your comment that did I hear <br />any comment would you like to perhaps... is that issue solved can the <br />..residents who live off the lake be further restricted than the ones who .live <br />on the lake? in regards to surface use? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.