My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 01-11-1978
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1978
>
PRECM 01-11-1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:32:51 AM
Creation date
3/19/2007 11:46:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~J <br />2) Tr:nt all proposed uses of: tree Long Lake Regional Park <br />o*. !!er than .those listed above be deleted from ttie Long <br />1:f:e Concept Plan; specifically: <br />canoe rental <br />boat launch <br />tent camping <br />3) 'that ~~r;y recommended development be limited to passive <br />Cleve lopment . <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Gerald Bensina <br />1851 - 5th Avenue N.ta. <br />New Brighton, Plinnesota <br />President - Long Lake Home Owners <br />Association <br />~l~ There was apparently some dispute in the Park Board regarding the definition of <br />passive uses of the park which appeared to be substantially preferred by a sub- <br />stantial majority of the public. It appeared to be the concept of some members of <br />the Planning Commis-ion that passive included any art ivity that was not organized. <br />By that definition it would in~~ludc~ tinuwmuhil.ing, motorcycle riding, water skiing, <br />etc., but k~ould ~xcl.ude organized activities such a5 motorcycle races, snc~wmubile <br />races and speed boat races. It was the conclusion of the Home Owners ASSU~.lati0(7 <br />that such a definition was totally contrary to the public's eoneept and any <br />rc>asonablc definition of the word passive. Passive appears to have been inter- <br />preted by the public_ to mean gentle, quiet, inactive, quiescent or a similar .functic~,. <br />This is supported by the fact that the majority of recommended uses included such <br />th.:ings as nature centers, bicycle trails, hiking trails and picnic uses. Uses <br />such as toboggan runs, ball. fields, overnight camping were extremely low on the <br />list of recommended uses. <br />l2) It should be noted that a smai percentage of the total population returned the <br />Long Lake questionnaires; that is ~+12 households. There has been some suggestion <br />that the percentage of returns .is toc~ sma1.1 to provide an accurare statistical <br />sample. Although a greater percentaie of rE:turns would have born pr.eferrahl.e, thr <br />sampling is amore accurate representation of public sentiment. than any other <br />de>vi.se available and, additi~m ally, expresses the concerns of thc~s~ citizens <br />genuinely inter~.st~-d in development of the 1..~.>ng Lake Regional Yank: It should br <br />noted that the Long i.ake Survey Tabulation excluded 68 cif the questionnaires in <br />the preparation of. the tabulation. All h8 of the excluded questionnaires wFre <br />sc!bmitted by citizens who requested a passive use of the park. Of the total <br />ctuc>.stionn~iires returned 8b% de:~ired passive uses, 8% desired both pa5si,ve and <br />active uses and 6% desired active uses; however, in the preparation of the tabulation <br />173; of. the questionnaires whir.h de5.i rc~d a passive use of the park were exc.l.uded. <br />`I'hc> resuat indicates that the pub.tic desires even more passive uses than those <br />i t.>mi.zed on tine bong Lake Survey T,~bulat ion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.