Laserfiche WebLink
P-3 <br /># ~ ~ <br /> 2. _ Meet the needs of various .user groups: There arefive <br /> areas in the City which either have no access to any <br /> neighborhood facilities and/or have land but no develop- <br /> merit. In addit'on,to the ahree areas noted above, the; <br /> Vermont Park and upper-western (29th Ave. site)~areas <br /> fall within these categories. Development :of ...four <br /> -sites should have a veryhigh priority. In addition to <br /> this, certain of the existing neighborhood parks have not <br /> been developed to their full potential. Among improvements <br /> of .this nature are tennis courts. There is available <br /> space for tennis courts at Freedom Park, the-29th .Ave. <br /> site,:and silver Oak School. An open-drainage swale <br /> is present in Freedom Park. This is a nuisance, and <br /> maintenance problem. Piping this system could also <br /> p~ermitexpansion of the free skating area. Grading work <br /> at Totem Pole Park would expand the free skating area. <br /> .This can be accomplished through the operation budget. <br /> 3. Aesthetic Improvements: See discussion under Community <br /> Facilities.Sub-Program.. <br /> D. Recommendationsy <br /> <br /> . l . 1976 , <br /> a. Development Vermont Site $58,000 ($29,000 DNR Grant) <br /> b. Development 29th Ave. Site 63,Q00 <br /> 2 . _ .1977 <br /> a. Development Silver Oak Sate 67,000 ($32,500, S.D.282) <br /> b. 5tework 5th Street site 30;000 <br /> 3. 1978. <br /> a. Development 5th ,Street Site 69,000 <br /> b. Tennis Courts Freedom Park ,33,400. <br /> c. Drainage Freedom Park. 10,000 <br /> ' <br /> 4. 1979 <br /> <br /> A. No Projects Recommended <br /> 5. 1980. <br /> a. .Tennis Courts 29th Ave Site 35,000 <br />1 <br />