My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 12-05-1973
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1973
>
PRECM 12-05-1973
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:31:52 AM
Creation date
3/20/2007 11:54:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w t <br />PARK BOARD MINUTES <br />December 5, 197-3 <br />The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. <br />Board members present: Cook, Dahl, Gunderman, Smith, Weissman and <br />Council Representative Eagon. <br />Board members absent: Hagemeyer and Sherleok. <br />Others present: Charles H. Corlett, Department Intern and Robert <br />Wieklund, Director of Parks and Recreation. <br />The minutes of the regular meeting of November 7, 1973 were approved <br />as submitted. <br />Dahl. requested that the proposal from the Minnesota Environmental <br />Sciences Foundation, Incorporated be added to the agenda. <br />Park Proposal - Farr Property <br />The development on some 67 acres of property located on I-694 and <br />Silver Lake Road was explained to the Park Board. The development <br />by Darrel A.. Farr Company is to include a mix of apartment buildings <br />and cluster homes, totaling some 500 units. The Village owns 32 <br />acres of property adjacent to the development and the Farr Corporation <br />has offered to trade a more suitable site for the Village1s property <br />in order to provide park facilitie s. <br />Gunderman :.and Smith both commented that-they were concerned about the <br />drainage pond located on the property which Farr was going to trade <br />to the Village. They commented that it would create a maintenance <br />and esthetic problem resulting from siltation. Gunderman noted that <br />this kind of development would create an increase of approximately <br />1,.500 in population and that 32 acres was insufficient for a park <br />for this many people. He further stated that the development was <br />really not giving us anything. <br />Weissman indicated that he was opposed to trading the Village-owned <br />parcel, as he felt it would be extremely valuable as commerical <br />property at some future date. He further stated that the property <br />which Farr was intending to trade to the Village was too low and <br />swampy to be of any value whatever. <br />Smith suggested that the pond might be moved further south to create <br />a larger area available for park use. This would also create more <br />buildable property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.