My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 10-04-1972
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1972
>
PRECM 10-04-1972
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:12:42 AM
Creation date
3/20/2007 1:45:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />(2) <br />on the property and that any plan he would submit would submit would <br />not have a traffic linkage between Rice Creek and Long Lake. He stated <br />that development can maintain the environment and create a profitable <br />tax base and he does not believe the property should be acquired for <br />park land, speaking as a developer and as a resident. <br />Gunderman asked if boat traffic could be restricted on Long Lake through <br />legal means. It was noted that boat launching facilities can be re- <br />stricted but not actual use of the water. Certain restrictions can be <br />built-in by design. Hemmings reiterated the fact that the primary <br />concern kTas preservation of the land and use was secondary and would <br />be allowed only if compatible with the preservation. <br />Smith moved that the Park Board recommend to the Village Council that <br />the Ramsey County proposal for acquisition of the Miller property on <br />Rice Creek be approved with the provisions that no alteration or mod- <br />ification to the existing geography of land and water take place with- <br />out New Brighton Village Council approval. Seconded by Cook.. Motion <br />carries. <br />Discussion of Community School <br />The Board received an outline concerning the implementation of the <br />School District 621 Community School Program in New Brighton. <br />Hagemeyer moved that the outline be accepted as submitted. Seconded <br />by Smith, Motion carried. <br />Discussion of Lighting School Hockey Rinks <br />It was explained to the Board that several meetings had taken place <br />concerning the lighting of school hockey rinks. The proposal for <br />Irondale High School had fallen through due to the lack of a warming <br />facility near the rink and the lack of funds available to construct <br />such a facility. However, the rink at Highview Junior High School <br />appeared to amenable to lighting, as the school district vaould provide <br />a part of the school building available as a warming facility. The <br />school would also ?provide rubber matting for the floors and shatter- <br />proof glass on the doors. The Village in turn would have to finance <br />the installation of lights, the supervision of the rinks and the rental <br />of outside restrooms. However, the school district could not provide <br />a free-skating area at this time due to inadequate drainage. <br />Smith moved that the Park Board recommend to the Council that they <br />enter into an agreement with the school district whereby the Village <br />would finance the lighting of the hockey rink at Highview Junior <br />High School under the following conditionse <br />1. An effort is made to provide afree-skating area with proper <br />drainage for the winter of 1.973-197. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.