My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 07-01-1970
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1970
>
PRECM 07-01-1970
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:07:54 AM
Creation date
3/20/2007 4:02:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />1 <br />Park Board Meeting <br />Jtz ly 1, 1970 <br />Page 2 <br />Mr. Metzger then made the following recommendations: <br />The structure was poorly planned. There should not be <br />slides with the climbing device. The structure should <br />be lowered in height, more and .higher railings constructed <br />and a review take place to remove other hazards. The <br />piece should be re-located 100 feet to the east and <br />plantings done to screen it. A fence should be put up <br />across the lot lines to prevent traffic across the lawns. <br />Other residents commented that the sand around the structure was <br />carried on to the decks making them dangerously slippery. The <br />height of the walls. encourage children into walking around the tops <br />of the railing.. The unrailed platform was dangerous as children <br />used it as a diving board. <br />The Board then discussed the situation. It was expressed that safety <br />is a prime concern of the Board and that a re-evaluation would be <br />necessary. Individual members who had seen the structure listed <br />various problem areas including use of nails instead of bolts, the <br />beam across the north slide and the lack of adequate railings. <br />Councilman Morris stated that he had tested the structure and found <br />some specific hazards. He submitted rough drawings of the danger <br />areas including the beam across the slide, lack of support for the <br />platform on the top deck and lack of a guard rail for the deck above <br />the slide. <br />Oahl moved that a fence be placed around the structure until a review <br />of the hazards could take place with. the planner at a special meeting. <br />Sherlock seconded the motion. Motion passed. <br />The nuisance created by the structure could be solved by a fence and <br />would receive serious consideration by the Board. <br />The location of the structure was then discussed. The Board expre~s~d <br />the opinion that the present location should be given a chance. <br />Mr. Metzger stated that the planting plan was inadequate as a screen. <br />It was explained that a new plan was under consideration and there <br />would be opportunity for a review. <br />The appearance was determined to be a matter of choice and the Board <br />placed its confidence in the planner in this respects A resident.. <br />expressed concern over. the possibility of temporary Satellites being <br />placed'in the area. Mrs, E. E. Fisher quoted .from notes of a Board <br />Meting in July, 1969, when such a possibility was discussed.. The <br />Board has no plans for any buildings in that area at .this time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.