My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 11-24-1970
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1970
>
PRECM 11-24-1970
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:06:45 AM
Creation date
3/20/2007 4:23:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Park Board Ling ~ 2 <br />November 24970 <br />of the single-family unattached dwelling as the basis of community <br />development and a change in emphasis in the parks and recreation <br />field from a facility orientation to a people-orientation. He also <br />stated that a park system had five purposes; recreation, conservati~r, <br />ornamentation, reserve capacity and cultural. Relating these items <br />in terms of park planning, he suggested the following as a planning <br />process. First, a community should carry out a system analysis of <br />its existing park lands in terms of the five purposes. This is to <br />determine what objectives are being accomplished in terms of percentage <br />of land designed to fulfill each of the five purpose. Then the <br />community should determine what percentage of each purpose they want <br />to provide in the ultimate system. The difference between what <br />purposes are being served and what purposes the community desires to <br />provide forms the basis of the park plan. The community formulates <br />a policy statement which details what percentage of each type of <br />park land is desired and how much of each is needed to fulfill that <br />desire. Such a policy would insure that developer dedication lands <br />would conform to the park plan or a financial substitute would be <br />provided. This financial substitute can be justified on the basis <br />that the developer is buying into a going concern and that he should <br />invest an amount equalling the investment made by those who are <br />already in the community. <br />In conjunction the developer should be required to provide recreation <br />and open space facilities for his project. The policies on park <br />system development could serve as a guide to assist in providing <br />these facilities, such as percentage of-open space needed, density <br />per acre allowed, etc. In terms of priorities for the future, Brauer <br />stated his feeling that conservation, ornamentation and reserve would <br />be the most logical purposes to emphasize. He suggested that to <br />develop an extension of the comprehensive park plan, New Brighton <br />should follow a 4-step process; <br />1. Make a systems analysis of present facilities. <br />2. Adopt a policy on what is the desired percentage of each <br />type of use ( 5 purposes). <br />3. Determine the difference between what is existing and what <br />is desired (1 & 2). <br />4. Lay-out a course of action designed to extend what exists <br />into what is desired. <br />Brauer stated the present park system would be adequate to some <br />extent for the next ld years. <br />In terms of financing, he projected that federal monies would be <br />channeled into people-oriented programs. Those programs which stress <br />interaction among people as human beings as opposed to skill develop- <br />ment, physical fitness, etc, as the primary goal.. In a developed <br />community such as New Brighton the rational way to finance the <br />further development of the system is through general obligation bon.?.s. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.