Laserfiche WebLink
%° <br />.i . <br />PARS BOARD MEETING <br />March 4, 1970 <br />The meeting was called to order at 8415 p.m. <br /> <br />Present: Dahl, Hagemeyer, Hansen, Gunderman, Sherlock, Weissman, <br />Moen, Schaefer. <br />Absent: Barnhill <br />Minutes of regular meeting of February 4 and special meeting of <br />February 12, 1970 were approved as suk~mitted. <br />Selection of Chairman <br />Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Hagemeyer to nominate Richard Hansen <br />as chairman of the Park Board. Carried <br />Motion by Sherlock, seconded by Gunderman to close nominations. <br />Carried <br />There being no other names entered, Mr. Hansen became chairman of the <br />Park Board for 1970. <br />Vice Chairman <br />Motion by Dahl, seconded by Weissman to appoint ~trlyn Gunderman as <br />vice-chairman to fill the vacancy created by the elevation of <br />Mr. Hansen to chairman of the Park Board for 1970. <br />Carried <br />Motion by Sherlock, seconded by Dahl to close nominations. <br />Carried <br />Mr. Gunderman became vice-chairman of the Park Board for 1970._ <br />Discussion-7th Street Park Site Structure <br />A discussion was held with Mr. Arthur Dickey, architect, Dickey and <br />Associates, for the purpose of exploring preliminary ideas for a <br />shelter on the 7th Street park site. A number of comments were <br />offered by Board members. The following comments were made: <br />Is the 7th Street site to be the hub of community activity and should <br />an attempt be made to design a warming house which would later become <br />part of the large complex or should a temporary structure be moved <br />onto the site? <br />Consideration should be given to organizing a building program with a <br />time schedule. This is frequently done with many buildings. The <br />first stage is very important, since the utility size, site location <br />and other basics must be determined at that time. <br />There is a problem of dealing with a facility which would be useful <br />today. In attempting to fit this useful facility in with other ones <br />which there is no determination as to the future of the building <br />would be, what is the future of the present municipal building? <br />May it some day become the recreational site? <br />Although all of these factors have relevance, a concept should still <br />be developed, Should a building with a planned obsolescence.or <br />specific destruction or removal date be considered for the present? <br />