My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 03-03-1982
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1982
>
PRECA 03-03-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 2:46:17 AM
Creation date
3/22/2007 12:37:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Another concern he had, Carlson said, was about liquor. The <br />county•s ordinance allows a certain quantity per group. But <br />then 20 people sit here, 20 there, and you can have four <br />groups, so they can have eight cases of beer instead of two. <br />He said he would like this problem down on paper so that the <br />City Council and County Board knows it is a concern. <br />Commers asked what she could report to the Long Lake Improve- <br />ment Association. Could she quote from the Master Plan? <br />Dahl said it would be all right to quote, in context, but it <br />should be remembered that it was far from complete. Commers <br />said that maybe she should wait for the next draft. <br />Borgstrom said that he wanted it to get into the members <br />hands so that they could comment on it for the City Council. <br />Anderson asked Simons when it would likely be finished.. <br />Simons said that it could take a while. Borgstrom asked <br />whether the lake people could get the information at the same <br />time as the Park Board. <br />Anderson said that the next step would be the March 3 joint <br />meeting between the City Council and Park Board. After the <br />plan has been explained, then they will take testimony from <br />anyone who wants to talk. That will be the major opportunity <br />for .testimony on the Master Plan. <br />Bo rgstrom asked whether Anderson wanted input to come then <br />for .the first time or ahead of time. Dahl said that the Park <br />Board wants it on the 3rd. Th'r'.~~ meeting will not be a <br />decision-making night. The Park Board will meet later to <br />make their recommendation to the council. Then the council <br />will have to have a hearing. <br />Borgstrom said that his concern is that because Cook, Commers <br />and he are on the committee it would be thought that this was <br />the feeling of the residents and he did not want the Park <br />Board to be disappointed. Carlson said that they need all the <br />comments, then the Park Board will make a recommendation. <br />Simons said that the Master Plan is the staffs position. <br />Then they want the Park Board to prepare a list of questions <br />on paper .and they will review that and make modifications, <br />where acceptable, or respond in writing about those they can <br />not accept, and then they will send the Master Plan to the <br />City Council. They will then react and state their concerns <br />and the staff will Piave to respond to them. Some items will be <br />negotiable, some will not. <br />Simons said that the term "daycamp" was being taken off the <br />plan because the large group picnic area will hold it. What <br />was the daycamp area can be enlarged into a medium-size <br />group picnic area. There will be no lodge. They have to show <br />_g_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.