Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />LONG LAKE PARK STUDY COMMITTEE MINUTES <br />January 20, 1982 <br />Members Present: Ellen Dahl, Jim Borgstrom, Susan Brustman, <br />George Carlson, Pat Commers, Marv Cook, <br />Dorraine Olson <br />Others Present: John Commers, Bill Jacobs, Ken Johnson, <br />Maurie Anderson, Ken Simons <br />The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dahl. She <br />introduced Bill Jacobs, the chairman of a financial task <br />force. <br />Jacobs said that the subject of searching for other financial <br />options for the parr had come up at a Park Board meeting, and <br />that he was assigned to be chairman of a task force to .study <br />the matter. He dial that, he said, and gave Maurie and Arlie <br />a couple of schedules of ideas and concepts. The concept is <br />that the city has a valuable piece of property that everyone <br />wants to see as a park. If properly handled, it could become <br />a great asset for the city and could generate revenue in the <br />future. To turn it aver to the Metropolitan Council without <br />any profit or interest on the bonds would be the least attrac- <br />tive option, he said. <br />Dahl asked Jacobs if he had gotten some reaction from. Ramsey <br />County. He said that he had not, but would proceed with a <br />group of volunteers. Jacobs then presented his material. <br />Dahl explained that the purpose of the Long Lake Park Study <br />Committee was to work on the development, not financial consi- <br />derations and his presentation should be taken to the Park <br />Board. Jacobs said that he would be happy to take it to the <br />Park Board and the City Council. He came to this committee <br />because he thought every organization involved with the park <br />should be involved and concerned. <br />Simons commented that he did not think the material presented <br />a fair analysis of the metropolitan park concept. Not shown <br />is a schedule where the city's reimbursement for its property <br />has been invested. Jacobs agreed to run off a schedule to <br />show that investment. <br />Another problem, Simons said, was that New Brighton would <br />incur the costs of police and fire protection no matter which <br />option is selected. Jacobs argued that if it became a metro- <br />politan park, the city should not have a negative cash flow. <br />If you give up your land, he said, you should incur no costs. <br />If anyone from the Metropolitan Area can use the park, New <br />Brighton should not have to pay. <br />Simons said that in all cases municipalities provide the police <br />service. He added that that did not mean that some day the <br />city could not approach the county to ask for a contract. He <br />also said that the city is already providing the service. <br />