My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 09-01-1982
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1982
>
PRECM 09-01-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 2:41:07 AM
Creation date
3/22/2007 2:48:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 1, 1982 Park Board Minutes <br />Page 5 <br />Van Hatten stated he is willing to draft a proposal and have it <br />ready for the next Park. Board meeting. <br />Anderson said that in response to Carlson, don't want to see the <br />transfer ..delayed. Don't think it is necessary. <br />Carlson said he is not speaking in terms of the. Council but'the <br />public. The public wants to know. when the money is transferred. <br />Tell them now how we want to handle the money.. Want them to know <br />it is something we have been thinking about for a long time. <br />Anderson said he likes Van Hatten's idea. <br />Carlson and Johnson .said they would be willing to help Van Hatten.. <br />Motion by Van Hatten, seconded by Carlson, to recommend that the <br />money from the sale of land from Long Lake Park be put into a <br />permanent fund and_the interest be designated as follows: <br />-The entire cost of New Brighton's share of operation <br />and maintenance of Long Lake Park be taken .from the <br />interest-from the sale of Long Lake Park <br />-A fixed amount be added to the fund yearly to increase <br />the dollar value <br />-The remainder of the interest be used for park purposes <br />as necessary. <br />Johnson asked if anything should be added-about not touching. the <br />principal. <br />Van Hatter said the intent is clear. <br />Johnson said we could add that only the interest be used. <br />Van Hatten said we can't tell them they can't. <br />Motion by Carlson, seconded by Olson, to amend the motion <br />recommending that the principal should not be touched. <br />Motion carried., Van Hatten opposed. <br />Motion with amendment carried. <br />V. New Business <br />A. Citizen Survey <br />Gunderman said he-was pleased that on .the survey parks did so well. <br />Don't think we should overact because if we would have listened <br />to the survey years back there would not be any parks in New <br />Brighton Feel it is the Park Board's job to direct and make <br />decisions. <br />Fornell said that on one of the survey questions people stated <br />they were not in favor of acquisition of parks. Tt could be just <br />the: way it was worded too'.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.