My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 04-23-1984
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1984
>
PRECA 04-23-1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 2:56:19 AM
Creation date
3/29/2007 2:42:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• much of-the lake shore is privately owned such controls. <br />are difficult to enforce and impractical. The Master Plan <br />clearly indicates that the proposed Regional Park concept <br />creates .the possibility of boating pressure exceeding the <br />capacity of the lake (pg V-1 and VIII-1). <br />Enforcement of boating. safety regulations will, in all <br />probability, become a demand on the water patrol which <br />is already understaffed. In order to enforce such art- <br />icles as section 19-31 of the WSUM guidelines (time zonin;) <br />and 19-33 (directional travel), I feel the water patrol <br />will be forced to leave other area lakes without adequate. <br />patrol.. At the 10/19/83 meeting of the Z.Z. committe e <br />Maurice Anderson indicated this patrolling would be done <br />by the City. The Master Plan (pg X-2) states Ramsey <br />County. However the WSUM guidelines include the New, <br />Brighton Police. I know of no water patrol in New Brigh- <br />ton. Further, I see no provision for funding for a ws,ter <br />• patrolman by New Brighton in .the proposal. When I pur- <br />sued this issue, pointing out the possibility of full <br />' time enforcement and additional costs, I was told by <br />Anderson that we should have a meeting with the Sheriff <br />for clarification.. I requests~ithisi the meetings of 10/19/83 <br />and .01/18/84 reflect it. The_eubject has- yet to be,di~- <br />cussed. <br />Example. s <br />Time zoning in itself, as requested by New Brighton and <br />indicated in the WSUM, has the potential of further in- <br />creasing the congestion on the water.' It limits those <br />affected by the time zoning to pursue .their interests <br />only between the hours of 12-6 pm on week ends and hol- <br />idaysi riparians included, which eliminates any chance <br />of spreading out the potential concentration of users <br />and is applied during the peak use times of the boating <br />season. This definitely needs a patrolman.. <br />U <br />;The fishing docks planned for the park further pose a <br />serious safety problem. On (pg IX-11) reference is made <br />to the installation and a map (pg IX-16) illustrates this. <br />on (pg IX-12) further detail of the docks indicates they <br />will extend into the lake to a depth of at least 6 ft. <br />Referring to a topographical map of the lake, I find at <br />least two of the docks will probably extend. beyond .the <br />100 foot 'no wake' zone. Considering this, which body <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.