Laserfiche WebLink
Council Minutes <br />May 14,1985 <br />Harcus believes there is potential for a problem between the <br />homeowners and outsiders with boats and the swimming area. <br />Schmidt believes the net cost reduction should be focused <br />upon, noting there may be some additional operational costs <br />to the city. <br />Janecek favors the proposed amendments but feels that when <br />the operational agreements are negotiated, the county should <br />perhaps share in the city's cost of monitoring the boat <br />launch area. <br />Schmidt mentioned that, in terms of savings to develop the <br />boat launch, the dollars are coming through the Metropolitan <br />Council, flowing through the County; asked if there would <br />be any real net savings to Ramsey County on the operational <br />portion of the plan in moving the boat ,launch. <br />Anderson didn't believe there was any reduction in cost to <br />the county for either development or operations. <br />Schmidt wanted the issues addressed when the proposed amend- <br />ment was discussed; trying to negotiate with Ramsey County <br />for any additional dollars would be very difficult. <br />A resident asked why the boat launch was determined to be <br />placed on the east side of Long Lake. <br />Anderson explained the primary reason was to control access <br />to the boat launch through a normal control point; one of <br />the provisions of the plan was that the city would limit the <br />number of power boats through the public access, which could <br />only be done with a person. Anderson explained why other <br />potential access, points were eliminated from the final plan. <br />In response to Schmidt's inquiry about saving trees as a <br />visual barrier to persons living. around the lake, Anderson <br />stated that a quarter of a mile of a 3Q-foot road coming <br />through a treed area would not be built under this proposal. <br />Blomquist commented he was pleased to see the recommendations, <br />the Cost savings, and the work with the Historical Society <br />an the depot and the preservation of the ice .houses; the proposed <br />amendments speak well of the process, the initiation, and <br />beyond the planning stages through development. <br />Benke shared enthusiasm for moving the boat .launch to save <br />construction costs and the impact on the foundations. However, <br />the increase in operating cosies were of concern; feels a need <br />for alternatives built into the system (parking meters, gates, <br />spikes in a road) to control the parking operation to the maxi- <br />mum extent possible that come out of the savings of the capitol <br />investment, and have a net reduction then in the ongoing operat- <br />ing casts which are the responsibility of the city. Henke was <br />assured there will be discussion of those concerns. <br />Page Eight <br />