My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 06-05-1985
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1985
>
PRECM 06-05-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 2:49:05 AM
Creation date
3/30/2007 11:33:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Minutes <br />May 14, 1985 <br />page Seven <br />Benke noted that 11 large homes could be built of the same size, <br />mass, height, design, and appearance (instead of 22 single family <br />homes) and the city and neighbors would still have the same con- <br />cerns and wondered where the city could find the trade-off between <br />the neighborhood's concern for quality and the architect's concern <br />for a marketable development. <br />Harcus suggested continuing the public hearing to allow the devel- <br />oper.time to consider an Association, private streets; Blomquist <br />asked the developer to consider the alternative of single family <br />homes on the north and the splits on the south; restrictions an <br />the location of the three-level homes. Janecek asked to see the <br />footprints for the twinhomes versus footprints for single family <br />houses. <br />Motion by Harcus, seconded by Janecek, to CONTINUE THE PUBLIC <br />HEARING ON THE REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVEL- <br />OPMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A TWIN- <br />HOME DEVELOPMENT AT 1252 SILVER LAKE ROAD AND ADJg1NING VACANT <br />LAND Tp JUNE 11, 1985. <br />Schmidt stated he had na bias against the twinhame concept and <br />suggested that if there had to be a transition, it should be a <br />good one slanting more of the density to the east and the south <br />side of the project. <br />Blomquist stated he would also like to see a comparison of the <br />height of the buildings, particularly as it relates to Brighton <br />Place to the south and the single family residents to the north, <br />indicating projected elevations. <br />Benke noted he would be out of town an June 11, 1985; other <br />councilmembers indicated they would be present,as four members <br />would be required. <br />5 Ayes - 0 Noyes, Motion Carried <br />Anderson commented that the amendments proposed for the Long <br />Lake Regional Park Master Plan are concerning the physical <br />planning of the park and that operational details (ie. staffing <br />of control points) would be worked on at a later time if the <br />physical planning is approved. Anderson noted that Jan Newham <br />and Gayle Bromander from the Historial Society were present to <br />answer any questions, and that Ken Simons was present from <br />Ramsey County's park planning staff to also answer questions. <br />Harcus asked if the Department of Natural Resources would be <br />stocking the lake; Anderson had no answer. <br />Harcus agrees with the changes that are taking place; believes <br />there are other ways to deal with the lake concerning over- <br />crowing and safety issues. <br />LLRP Master Plan <br />Amendments <br />Report 85-136 <br />Anderson noted the amendment does not increase the size of the <br />boat launch facility. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.