My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 09-07-1994
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1994
>
PRECM 09-07-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 2:15:32 AM
Creation date
4/2/2007 2:42:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 7, 1994 New Brighton Pazk Boazd Minutes <br />V. New Business <br />A. Silver Oak Planning. <br />Anderson gave the history of the pazk. In 1977 or '78 the City had a <br />discussion with the St. Anthony School Boazd about updating the play <br />equipment. A play wood structure was installed. The ball field was <br />upgraded. In about 1980 the School District decided to sell the <br />property. There was a three way discussion between the School <br />District, the developer; Jake Cadwallader, and the City. Around 1970 <br />had received a grant to put in two tennis courts. The courts aze on <br />private (the developer's) property. An agreement was made that the <br />courts remain on his. property until he decides to develop. The <br />agreement was that when he developed the property, the tennis courts <br />would be relocated onto park property at the developer's expense. <br />Because of the grant for the tennis courts, they must be put on the pazk <br />site. <br />There is a 60 foot strip of property that the Pazk Board has <br />recommended be sold to the developer. The property will probably be <br />used by the developer for parking. It is a steep slope. <br />Resident Jerry Renk, 1931 3rd St. SW, inquired if the developer would <br />be developing the property to the west of the tennis court. Anderson <br />said yes. <br />Resident George Zurbey, 1801 3rd St. SW, asked how much the City <br />would get for the property and suggested the City keep it and use it for <br />pazking. Anderson said the property has been appraised at $45,000. <br />The developer wants to have his own appraisal done, he believes the <br />appraisal came in too high. <br />Resident Mazy Catroneo, 1827 3rd St. SW, inquired about the City <br />using that strip of land for parking. Anderson said it could be looked <br />at. <br />A resident asked if both tennis courts had to stay in the park, if so do <br />they have to stay together or could they be split up. Put one by the <br />ball field and one by the basketball court. <br />Anderson said we have to keep both courts but they could be split up. <br />A resident said the azea that has been leveled for the tennis courts has <br />been used for football and soccer. Could you put the soccer and <br />hockey in the lower area? <br />Anderson said we can't get equipment up there. Maybe we could get <br />an easement from the condo parking lot. Partial hockey boards (at both <br />ends could be put up. Then the .rink may be used more. It should be <br />noted that there can't be a hockey rink and grass (soccer field) in the <br />same area. Grass will not grow where there is an ice rink. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.