My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 12-02-1992
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1992
>
PRECA 12-02-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 1:50:55 AM
Creation date
4/3/2007 3:28:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />November 6, 1992 <br />To: Dave Childs, City Manager <br />From: Maurice H. Arid ~~ for of Parks and Recreation <br />Re: Round-Up Program <br />The City of Roseville has recently adopted a program whereby residents are encouraged to <br />voluntarily increase their water bill payment as a means of providing the City with non-tax <br />dollars for beautification and conservation programs. (see attached). The program. has never <br />been tried before in a city, however, DNR and other agencies have experienced success with <br />similar programs. Roseville's program is so new that no money has been generated yet but <br />they are expecting revenues in the $50,000 range annually. <br />I think the city of New Brighton should consider implementing a similar program sometime <br />during the 1993 billing season. This appears to be a relatively painless way of generating <br />additional dollars for park/environmental or other programs. <br />There are a vast array of strategies that could be used in implementing this program. Funds <br />from a program such as this could be used for crime or drug prevention, recreation program <br />development, scholarship or seniors programming or ombudsman as well as environmental <br />programs. <br />Roseville's program is essentially a "spend as you go" with only a slight delay built in as <br />projects are developed and approved. The primary advantage to this approach is that people <br />who participate are able to quickly see the results of their donations. An alternative would <br />be to attempt to develop an endowment fund which would ultimately provide interest income <br />to provide funding for projects or services. The fact that donated money is being placed in a <br />permanent trust for a specific purpose might encourage givers. Conversely, the "delayed <br />action" feature might prove to be a disadvantage. <br />Whatever approach we take, I think the idea has lots of merit and should be discussed with <br />the Council, packaged and presented for final approval within the next couple of months. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.