1986-03-25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I I Council Meeting Minutes March 25, 1986 Council Business, continued Krueger had nothing further to add to the staff report concern- ing a request by the Planning Commission that the City Council direct staff to prepare an amendment to the definition of gross floor area that exempts atrium space with no floor area, and stated that action could be taken at the next council meeting. Motion by Gunderman, seconded by Schmidt, to DEFER REPORT 86-73 TO THE APRIL 8, 1986, COUNCIL MEETING. 5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried Krueger had nothing to add to the staff report concerning a re- quest to build a single family home on a lot less than 75 feet wide and less than 10,000 square feet in area; stated the appli- cants were present, and the Planning Commission has recommended approval of the variance request. Motion by Schmidt, seconded by Williams, to WAIVE THE READING AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING VN-246 SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS. 5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried Krueger reviewed staff report concerning an application for a preliminary PRO and plat to permit a zero-lot-line development, stating staff did not find the request in the best interest of the public, and noted the Planning Commission recommended denial of the request. Locke noted this property is within the Water Ridge Development site's single family home portion; we have received a revised propsal from Jerry Svee on the retainers for the entire Water Ridge contract which is in the process of being reviewed by Miller & Schroeder, the city's bond counsel, to determine how that would work out on the project. Locke felt we should have further information available within the next two weeks. Gordy Hedlund, applicant for the PRD-46 and PL-144, stated it would be okay to table his application for two weeks if some progress is made within that time. In response to Gunderman's question, Locke indicated that within two weeks he anticipated meeting with Miller & Schroeder to determine whether or not the project can move ahead, noting Svee is anxious to move ahead as well. Benke asked the nature of the project composition; Hedlund indicated he signed as a developer in the Water Ridge project for both single family and for apartments, but both fell through because the city did not purchase the land and the contract was going to be rewritten. Page Seventeen Gross Floor Area Report 86-73 VN-246 - Dynamic Designers Report 86-74 Resolution 86-29 PRD-46 and PL-144 - Leier Estates No. 2 Report 86-75