Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />February 11, 1986 <br /> <br />Briggs stated that 50% of the property drains into the pond; <br />however, the building will drain to the north in a holding pond. <br />Briggs stated that the proposed building has a ground coverage of <br />12,544 square feet which represents about 7% of the property <br />(without the pond, it represents about 10% of the property). In <br />reviewing 19 ordinances, Briggs found that 30-40% of a site is a <br />reasonable amount of floor area, and 80-90% of the property can <br />be covered by impervious materials, including the parking and the <br />building. With regard to the hardship, the developer does believe <br />the pond creates a hardship. <br /> <br />Briggs stated the proposed building, although it is three stories <br />high, is no larger than would be allowed under the building ordi- <br />nance, which demonstrates it would have a negligible impact on <br />the neighborhood; explained the construction of the three stories <br />to fall within the guidelines for an average two-story building. <br /> <br />Briggs stated that, as a result of the neighborhood meetings, <br />one-third of the corner windows have been eliminated on the <br />neighbors' side of the building which will be 36 feet high, the <br />building has been moved an additional 15 feet further from the <br />neighbors' property lines giving a 65-foot setback (WhiCh is 30% <br />over what is required), changed the facing of the building to <br />white and black granite with non-reflective glass, and reduced <br />the height from 42 feet to 36 feet. In addition, the parking <br />area and the entrance had been changed in order to save more of <br />the existing trees. <br /> <br />In response to Martinson's request, the developer looked at de- <br />signing the building in steps, but found it would not be economi- <br />cally feasible to do so as office space would be lost. <br /> <br />With regard to landscaping, if after the building is built staff <br />believes additional trees would be required, the developer would <br />be happy to comply. <br /> <br />If the proposed building was not approved, Keith Harstad, appli- <br />cant, had advised Briggs he would then build a decent two-story <br />brick building, less expensive than the proposed building, with- <br />in 50 feet of the neighbors, having windows all the way around <br />it, and would be a standard shoe-box building. <br /> <br />Briggs closed by saying the city has the responsibility to pro- <br />mote quality developments, because quality attracts quality. <br /> <br />Page Seven <br />