Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />January 28, 1986 <br /> <br />Krueger had nothing to add to the staff report concerning an <br />aplication for final PRD and plat approval for a single family <br />housing development; noted the Planning Commission recommends <br />approval of the application; and stated that representatives <br />of the applicant were present to answer any questions. <br /> <br />Motion by Wi 11 iams, seconded by Schmidt, to APPROVE FINAL PRD-45 <br />ArJD PL-143 SUBJECT TO THE CONOITIGrJS OF CITY COUtJCIL RESOLUTION <br />PASSED DECEMBER 10, 1986. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Proper had nothing to add to the staff report concerning a peti- <br />tion for street and utilities to serve proposed Bel-Air Park <br />No.9. <br /> <br />Motion by Schmidt, seconded by Brandt, to ADOPT A RESOLUTION <br />fl,CCEPTIr-1G ,; PETITIOn i~rJO ORDERI"lG ;~rJ ENGI~IEERPJG STUDY :-OR PRO- <br />VIDIflG STREET Arm UTILITIES TO S~RVE PROPOSED BEL-AIR PARK NO.9. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 ~layes, ~1otion Carried <br /> <br />With regard to four ordinance amendments pertaining to elderly <br />and elderly housing, Krueger stated the Planning Commission's <br />minutes clearly summarized its discussion and stated the enforce- <br />would be looked at in greater depth as the entire city code is <br />reviewed. <br /> <br />In response to Benke's question concerning "55 years of age or <br />older," Krueger stated she had called several different state and <br />municipal ity agencies to find out the age requirements. The <br />findings were that the agencies are trying to include a larger <br />segment of the population, and the developers like to to able to <br />include that age group in their marketing as people are making <br />decisions before they retire. <br /> <br />Brandt asked if the density for elderly housing development was <br />calculated on 50% of the minimum lot area per dwell in9 because of <br />the lack of the presence of children in elderly housing; '(rueger <br />confirmed. <br /> <br />Motion by Schmidt, seconded by Gunderman, to WAIVE THE READING <br />AND HOLD ~HE FIRST READING OF ORDI~ANCE AMENDMENTS TO THE NEW <br />BRIGHTON ZONING CODE BY DELETING THE REFERENCE TO SUBSIDIZED IN <br />SEcnGrI 7-060(g) (4), DELETUG THE DEFINITION OF SUBSIDIZED <br />HOUSING, CREATlNG A DEFINITION OF ELDERLY HOUSING AND AMENDING <br />THE CURREN~ QEFINITION O~ AN ElD~RlY PERSON. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Page Five <br /> <br />PRD-45 and PL-143 <br />Belair Builders <br />Report 86-21 <br /> <br />Bel-Air Park No.9 <br />Petition for Street <br />and Util ities <br />Report 86-22 <br />Resolution 86-5 <br /> <br />Ordinance Amendments <br />elderly and elderly <br />housing <br />Report 86-23 <br />