Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />August 26, 1986 <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />Council Business, continued <br /> <br />Sinda stated that perhaps the Board had not had an opportunity to <br />look at the fact that the Closed Bond Fund dollars now earn <br />interest which the city can use in any way it sees fit; if we <br />start using the Fund, we lose interest which will have to be <br />replaced by taxes; Sinda further stated our financial advisors <br />advise us that if we want to keep our bond rating, which we would <br />like to raise, we need more reserves. The reserves we do have <br />include our Closed Bond Fund. If, in fact, our bond rating can <br />be raised, every time we sell bonds it costs the city less to <br />finance them and if we can keep our bond rating and not have it <br />reduced, we save. In summary, Sinda stated we do have the closed <br />bond fund that is part of the reserve and that needs to be taken <br />into consideration when council makes its decision. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Benke asked, in terms of the inter-fund loan, would we not also <br />charge flat interest to that loan and that interest would be a <br />cost of the litigation settlement that we would hopefully ulti- <br />mately recover so that, in effect, the primary impact would be <br />in the reserve levels for cash flow and for the reserves for a <br />bond rating; Egan responded affirmatively. <br /> <br />Poston added that the Financial Policy Advisory Board did recom- <br />mend that this is the only circumstance, an isolated circum- <br />stance, where it would propose that the rates not cover those <br />costs and basically it was due to the proximity of the settlement <br />and the expectation of a settlement in the city's favor; however, <br />for future similar occurences the Board does recommend that the <br />utility services be consided enterprise funds, which they are, <br />and that the cost of those services be recovered through rates. <br />Poston further stated that the Board will shortly be bringing to <br />the council the results of a study on the use of the closed bond <br />fund. <br /> <br />Benke asked if the Board was suggesting the council leave the <br />current system in place, given the proximity of the settlement <br />and any future similar problems the city go one-hundred percent <br />user or enterprise paid; Poston stated there is a cash problem <br />right now in the water service fund and, in order to remedy that, <br />the Board is suggesting that that be remedied through an inter- <br />fund loan from the closed bond fund. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Egan stated the Advisory Board report suggests the city pull <br />from rates for contamination litigation costs and debt costs; at <br />minimum, the Board states the city needs to address the cash <br />deficiency. <br /> <br />Schmidt stated the city will undoubtedly recover the interest it <br />has been paying on these bonds as well as the water rates, and <br />asked what will be the equitable way to put that money into some <br />other fund, recognizing that people have been paying for it as we <br />went along; what are we going to do with the money at the point <br />it actually materializes. <br /> <br />Page Three <br />