Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />July 8, 1986 <br /> <br />Council Business, continued <br /> <br />Green stated he was in agreement with what council had been <br />discussing. <br /> <br />LeFevere summarized if council is consistent with the cap (per <br />staff recommendation) the action would be to authorize the <br />execution of the revised Assessment Agreement and the Escrow <br />Agreement by the Mayor and the City Manager, subject to changes <br />(1) to provide supplemental assessment may be against more than <br />45 lots to be determined by the city according to its normal <br />assessment policy; (2) provision for reducing assessments to <br />actual costs by amendment to apply only to construction costs; <br />and (3) amend language in escrow agreement to delete the <br />differentiation between the two causes so that the engineer <br />could make a draw on the escrow in the case of any settlement, <br />assigning the rights of the city. <br /> <br />Proper asked if there was an intent to increase the cost. Schmidt <br />feels we should increase the contingency to provide an additional <br />cushion. <br /> <br />Proper suggested levying assessments based on the bids plus ten <br />percent. LeFevere stated if bids are higher than anticipated, <br />council may either end the project or go back to the Seminary; <br />and suggested it would be better to determine a dollar amount. <br />Proper felt the estimate plus twenty percent would be adequate. <br /> <br />LeFevere stated the Seminary would not necessarily be the one to <br />get the money back; Schmidt stated it could be Pratt Homes or the <br />individual home owner; LeFevere stated if prepaid, it would be to <br />that person. <br /> <br />Attorney for the Seminary, stated the Seminary would be <br />comfortable in signing the agreement and leave the numbers to be <br />determined as the bids plus ten percent. <br /> <br />Motion by Schmidt, seconded by Gunderman, to AUTHORIZE EXECUTION <br />OF THE AGREEMENTS AS AMENDED SUBJECT TO FINAL ATTORNEY AND STAFF <br />APPROVAL. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Schmidt stated this is the first year we are to receive revenue <br />from subscribers and we should anticipate that in March of 1987 <br />New Brighton will receive about $27,000 from Group W which is <br />available for cable-related activities. There will be a <br />letter coming that will reinforce the joint powers agreement <br />regarding the spending of the monies. <br /> <br />Schmidt further informed council that Continental formed a new <br />company with Hauser; the North Suburban Cable Commission approved <br />the Group W transfer to the consortium of five buyers; and Hauser <br />had asked to buy it from the consortium and that NSCC rejected <br /> <br />Page Twelve <br /> <br />Cable Update: <br />$27,000 <br />