My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1986-06-10 (2)
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1986
>
1986-06-10 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2005 5:24:59 AM
Creation date
8/11/2005 11:55:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />June 10, 1986 <br /> <br />Public Hearings, continued <br /> <br />Resident asked, if the power lines go underground, what will <br />happen with existing telephone and Group W cable lines and what <br />the cost would be; Benke stated the franchise with Group W is <br />that underground phones have underground cable; and noted that NSP <br />would bear the cost of putting any overhead lines into an under- <br />ground system. <br /> <br />Resident feels the people should be told about the big boxes that <br />go into front yards; Pritchard reviewed where the boxes currently <br />exist. <br /> <br />Benke asked if the overhead transformers would be replaced by a <br />like number of boxes; Pritchard stated they would. <br /> <br />Benke asked what type of landscaping NSP would provide; Pritchard <br />stated NSP provides no landscaping, usually homeowner plants some <br />shrubs around the boxes and learn to listen to the hum. Pritchard <br />further stated that years ago NSP tried to bury the boxes but <br />found it costly because they then created a high failure rate. <br /> <br />Schmidt stated Group W's experience with underground construction <br />was not a viable experience; all of the consumers selected under- <br />ground and the city paid those costs. <br /> <br />Benke stated he had received a survey and was surprised at the <br />number who supported the underground. <br /> <br />Paul Sjolund, 1927 Long Lake Road, is paying $2.00 per month for <br />underground services and received a response from NSP that any <br />power lines that would be moved back, would be moved back to the <br />lot line so they would never have to be moved again. Stated that <br />Long Lake Road is very visible to the community and, regarding a <br />hazard, when services are interrupted, lines have been known to <br />fall on cars, etc. Sjolund further stated he feels putting in <br />cables while the road is being upgraded would be similar to in- <br />stalling cable in new developments. <br /> <br />Barb Damon, 1667 Daisy Court, stated she has underground and feels <br />underground on Long Lake Road would enhance the aesthetics. <br /> <br />Hugo Hyatt, 1903 Daisy Court, has underground; has not had service <br />interrupted in the past eight years; if council decides to go un- <br />derground, why not go between the street and the side walk. Benke <br />believes that is where it would go and that place ment could be <br />coordinated with street grading. <br /> <br />Walter Martin, 17th Avenue, lives one block off Long Lake Road and <br />asked if the lines behind his house would be underground; Benke <br />stated the lines are connected to overheads on Long Lake Road, and <br />that only the line from Long Lake Road to the first pole would be <br />undergrounded. <br /> <br />Page Thirteen <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.