My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-07-09
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1985
>
1985-07-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2005 5:17:37 AM
Creation date
8/11/2005 12:16:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />July 9. 1985 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Public Hearings <br /> <br />Winkels asked. because of the Federal notification requirements, <br />that the hearing for Skillman Corp. be rescheduled for July 23, <br />1985, and also for the next two public hearings (New Brighton <br />Inns, Inc. and Hal-Fics, Inc.), <br /> <br />Winkels reviewed the Skillman project and stated he believes <br />there will be f~nds available September 1st and there is a good <br />possibility of securing other allocations prior to September 1st, <br />as the projects are there and the applicants are willing at this <br />time to pay the one ~ercent deposit to secure the funds, <br /> <br />Blomquist asked if there were costs associated with keeping the <br />Industrial Revenue Bond allocation available for a long period <br />of time: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Winkels stated that once September 1, 1985 comes, we could keep <br />that allocation; either the city or the applicant would have to <br />put up the one percent (l~) of the allocation amount, to be placed <br />with the State, to reserve that allocation. We can require the <br />applicant to pay the one percent (l~), which is refundable to the <br />applicant at the time of closing. which must take place before <br />December 31. 1985. If they do not close, they are subject to losing <br />that deposit, After November 1. 1985, no portion of the deposit is <br />refundable, <br /> <br />Janecek asked how we would determine which of the three applicants <br />would put up the one percent, Winkels responded that we could re- <br />quire all three applicants to make the deGosit and suggested it be <br />done that way, as in the past, because it would reserve the alloca- <br />tion for them, it shows some intent of resolve to follow through, <br />and until November 1st, it is refundable. <br /> <br />Harcus suggested all three applicants be advised by staff, in <br />writing. of the process and a discussion of the one percent depos- <br />it so there is no confusion by any party. <br /> <br />Blomquist agreed to direct staff to inform the three applicants <br />that we intend to grant preliminary approval for all three projects <br />and to let them know this is consistent with the city's past policy <br />on issuing Industrial Revenue Bonds, <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Schmidt stated the one percent goes into effect on September 1st <br />and that it is conceivable that any of the applicants could be <br />ready for final approval before then. Winkels stated the appli- <br />cants could be back to the council by the end of August for final <br />approval, <br /> <br />Schmidt stated the council would have to be ready to give final <br />approval and asked staff to so advise the applicants, Winkels <br />responded that the applicants were already notified of that, but <br />it could also be put in writing. <br /> <br />Page Two <br /> <br />Public Hearings <br /> <br />Skillman Corp, <br />Report 85-189 <br /> <br />7:35pm-7:52pm <br /> <br />\ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.