My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 11-04-1981
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1981
>
PRECM 11-04-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 4:15:56 AM
Creation date
3/14/2007 5:42:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I. <br />II. <br />I <br />f <br />NEW BRIGHTON PARK BOARD MINUTES <br />NOVEMBER 4, 1981 <br />r <br />M~etir~g was called <br />^~. <br />Members present: <br />Members absent: <br />to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairperson Gunderman. <br />Grimshaw, Gunderman, Hogan, Olson, Council Repre- <br />sentative Schmidt. Dahl arrived at 7:40, Johnson <br />arrived at 7:35. <br />Carlson, Solberg, Van Hatten <br />Gunderman started an information session without a quorum. <br />Robert Polzak, Long Lake resident, presented an .alternative. to selling <br />the Long Lake. Park to Ramsey County. He suggested-that it may be <br />possible to devise a lease agreement that would more adequately pro- <br />tect the City's interests. <br />Gunderman asked why. the County would be interested. <br />Polzak used the $750,000 figure as a starting. <br />Anderson told hrn that the $750,000 comes from Met Council.. <br />Polzak said many things could be performed by the City rather than~the <br />County. We went. and got a bond issue - we can do alot other things. <br />One:~of the negatives-is that once you transfer the money, there is <br />nothing to go on in 10-15 years... As times and conditions change, ideas <br />and people change. With this concept you can beat it. You are going <br />to get .your money worth. Sometime in the future you will have a chance <br />to regroup. <br />~~ <br />Johnson said he agrees with that approach. He thinks about it from <br />a business standpoint and New Brighton's future. <br />Gunderman asked if the idea could be sold to the County. <br />Johnson said we own the Land. The park will never be developed with- <br />out our consent. The land is our trump card. <br />Val Burdick, resident at 1694 14th. Ave. NV'7, said the County has the <br />option of protecting their investment by maintenance, etc. This <br />allows them to continue. Right now - control stays here. County's <br />interest. is in value and maintenance of that lease-hold. If they <br />maintain, they have something they want to protect. <br />Gunderman commented that he never. heard any Park Board member say they <br />wanted to give up local control. <br />Burdick said that if the City sells the land, it is giving up control. <br />Polzak said .the buy out plan works here. We develop and take over <br />plan. We take over what the County does for us. Everything will <br />change eventually, then will have to regroup. Buy out plan buys <br />additional time for the County. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.