My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 06-01-1988
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1988
>
PRECM 06-01-1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 1:16:32 AM
Creation date
4/10/2007 4:30:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 1, 1988 Park Board Minutes <br />3 <br />Johnson said they want to grade and keep the area at <br />Innsbruck sloped, so there will be natural drainage away <br />from north where residents have a concern. <br />Olson would like to hear Anderson's concerns <br />Anderson said he liked the plan but was concerned about the <br />drainage issue. The estimate for drainage at Freedom was <br />$50,000. When the costs came in it was $200,000. $85,000 <br />might be saved by doing taking care of the water storage <br />problem at Innsbruck instead of at Freedom Park. <br />Anderson asked Johnson what the next step is. <br />Johnson said that the preliminary plat approval is the next <br />step. The goal is to move forward with the preliminary plat <br />approval, to do the grading and have home sites yet this <br />year. The feed back from the City Council and Planning <br />Commission is to work in two stages. <br />Seward asked if you will be creating a holding area on <br />Innsbruck Park. <br />Anderson said he prefers to have the water storage at <br />Innsbruck. The issue has to be resolved but it is not a <br />Park Board issue. The Park Board should express concern <br />about the water storage issue in the motion. <br />Anderson said he is not certain whether he wants the <br />northeast portion park because it is only swamp. <br />Johnson said it is 1.9 acres that could be cleared out and <br />made park. <br />Olson asked who owned the property east of the park. <br />Johnson said he was not sure, maybe a holding company. <br />Van Hatten asked why it wasn't part of this development. <br />Johnson said he didn't know. <br />Seward asked if Anderson desired that the Park Board approve <br />the plan without the northeast corner considered park. <br />Anderson said it is not a major issue. Only concerned <br />because of the drainage issue. <br />Anderson asked Johnson if there is potential for water <br />storage to the south. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.