Laserfiche WebLink
members to 7 on the Parks, Recreation and Environmental Commission. Another <br />- 2— <br />commission was at 7, so the Council thought they would make them all 7. There <br />is one commission that has to have a certain number; it is mandated by the State. <br />She suggested term limits for commission members. Harreld commented that it <br />was mentioned that there are many applicants when there are commission <br />openings. If you lower the number on the commission, there are not as many <br />opportunities. <br />Bauman stated if there are terms for members, new applicants would be on instead <br />of current members staying more than one term. This gives more people an <br />opportunity. <br />Frischman stated there has been a new role given to the Chairpersons of the <br />commissions in giving updates to the Council. This could be a great <br />communication tool between the commissions and City Council. Frischman asked <br />Bauman if she would reflect on this a little more. <br />Bauman felt this would be a way for the commission's to communicate with the <br />Council. It is once a year. Bauman felt it could be more often. The intent is to <br />gather the information of the commission and communicate to Council if there are <br />functions you want to do, a direction you want to head in, or a project you would <br />like to take on. <br />. V. Public Hearing <br />A. City Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Update — Kerry Thorne <br />Jason West introduced Kerry Thorne, Civil Engineer 1. Kerry said this is the 6`n <br />Annual meeting for the Storm Water Prevention Plan. Kerry stated this is a <br />program that the City is following because of the Clean Water Act established in <br />1969. In the mid 80's it was discovered that much of the water pollution was <br />coming from non -point sources (the stuff that is lying on the ground) and running <br />into the rivers. In response to this, the EPA created some new laws stating Cities <br />will now be mandated to prevent pollution on the land from going into the waters. <br />New Brighton was brought into this in 2003. MPCA notified New Brighton in <br />February of this year that they want to put New Brighton's permit on public <br />hearing. This is a 30 day process. They want us to make improvements to our <br />SWPPP to make sure we are addressing the Health Department's Drinking Water <br />vulnerability areas, as well as be able to make changes to the impaired waters. <br />MPCA Public Hearing process: <br />New Brighton is one of the last cities of about 200 to have their hearing. <br />Sometimes they group several cities together and do the hearings all at once. New <br />Brighton's hearing is on April 7, 2008 and lasts for 30 days. MPCA will inform us <br />of comments/responses and we have 30 days to respond to those. <br />Kerry also talked about drinking water vulnerability areas and impaired waters. <br />Forty to fifty percent of all bodies or water in the U.S. are impaired for one reason <br />or another. New Brighton has 3 water bodies listed on the impaired waters list; <br />