My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-23-2008
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2008
>
CCP 09-23-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2018 12:07:26 AM
Creation date
9/19/2008 1:38:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
East: High Density Residential <br />West: Long Lake Road interchange w/I-694 <br />SPECIAL USE PERMIT ANALYSIS • <br />Because the site is currently being governed by a Comprehensive Sign Plan, the applicant cannot <br />add a sign to the site without first obtaining a Special Use Permit. Per Zoning Code Section 9- <br />041 (4), the means to amend an existing Comprehensive Sign Plan is to approve a Special Use <br />Permit once determining the following criteria have been met (staff responses in italics): <br />a. That the sign plan provides sound identification, reduction of clutter, and aesthetic <br />enhancement. <br />Staff finds this criterion to be met. The proposed sign is of reasonable size, <br />orientation, and placement so as to minimize clutter on the southern fagade of the <br />structure. The applicant has proposed using a raceway as the method of attachment. <br />While individually -lit letters are considered the most desirable sign type from an <br />aesthetic stand point, the proposed raceway will match the existing fagade of the <br />structure, which is most suitable in terms of aesthetic enhancement. <br />b. That the sign plan is sensitive to and compatible with physical circumstances of the <br />site and buildings. <br />Staff finds this criterion to be me. The site has street frontage on 3 of its 4 sides. The <br />placement of the proposed side would be on the southern favade, which it the most <br />prominent in terms of street presence. Further, the sign is of reasonable size thus <br />being compatible with the physical circumstances of both the site and building. <br />C. That the sign plan is not detrimental to public safety. <br />Staff finds this criterion is met. Unlike some ground signs that can impact traffic <br />visibility, this proposed sign will be wall -mounted having no impact on public safety. <br />d. That the sign plan will not impede the normal and orderly placement of signs on <br />surrounding properties. <br />Staff finds this criterion to be met. Under general B-3 sign standards, absent the <br />Comprehensive Sign Plan, this sign would be permitted. Thus, staff feels the <br />surroundings properties are not impacted with regard to normal and orderly <br />placement of signs. <br />In addition to Section 9-041 (4), the following general health, safety and welfare criteria of <br />Section 8-130 must be considered (staffresponses in italics): <br />a. That the establishment, maintenance, or operations of the special use will not be <br />detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort of the general <br />public. <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.