1980-10-28 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I I , !J .oj(, city of New Brighton October 28, 1980 , . 1: ~ t Motion by Blomquist, seconded by Janecek to approve the relocation of the utilities pole at the Palmer Drive liquor store property and to authorize the expenditure of $1,000 for the pole relocation. S ayes - 0 nayes - motion carried ., ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ .1 ~ I Utilities Service Palmer Drive Liquor Store Supplement to Report No. 80-178 Mr. Wayne Babbitt representing the New Brighton Fire Relief Association was present to answer questions. ;~ ~ ~ Mr. Babbitt asked that Paragraph F, Article VII be amended by changing the lump sum amount from $300 to $4S0 and to amend Article IX, Section 3 to read as follows: Fire Relief Association Benefits Supplement to Report No. 80-17S RESOLUTION NO. 2392 1 "A fireman disabled while performing fire fighting duties who cannot perform his regular or comparable job shall receive a pension equal to the retirement amount for 30 years service. Such pension shall begin 12 weeks after the date of such disability and end if he returns to his job. If the fireman returns to his regular or comparable job but cannot return to firefighting duties, he shall receive a pension based on years of service from the date he started until he reaches 50 years of age and would have had 20 years of service. Benefits to begin when he reaches 50 years of age and has what would have been 20 years of service." .1 Motion by Benke, seconded by Blomquist to waive the reading and adopt a RESOLUTION AMENDING THE NEW BRIGHTON FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION PENSION AND DISABILITY BENEFITS as proposed in the August 1980 actuarial report by Hewitt Associates; and to approve the 1980 amended Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws with the addition of the above mentioned amendments. 5 ayes - 0 nayes - motion carried Mr. Vince Dahle, attorney representing the homeowner, was present. Hook-up Fee Oakwood Ponds Supplement to Report No. 80-134 Mr. Dahle stated that they objected to the fee since the homeowner's were not notified of additional fees that the hook-up fee was more than if the property was assessed, and that they objected as the Statutes of Limitations has expired and finally Mr. Dahle requested that the Council direct return of the property owner's hook-up fee paid in 1980. I t , , After discussing the issue, the City Council took no action. -3- i .