06-15-2010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Not Approved Stuff recommends approval of the Nonmonfier^' ng Use Permit, subject to the following; • Following removal of the detached gauge, the following site improvements are made: • Pavement is matched and mortared to ensure positive drainage. • Parking area is recovsmsted to meet a 15' front yard setback. • The parking area is re -striped to provide for 75 surface stalls. H fmure curbing AND sidewalk improvements are made to the parking area between the buildings and 35W, the parking lot is reconstructed to meet a 5' setback form the rear lot Into • The souNmly located detached gauge is repaired in that the exterior siding and doors are cleaned and reformed as needed. Commissiomr Schifed asked what it would cake for ted applicant to meet both the covered and uncovered parking requirements. City Planner Gmdlach responded either underground parking or a puking temp; neither of which would be practical. Chair Howard opened the Public Hearing Bernice Does asked why surveyors were working so fm away from the Property. City Planner Gmdlach explained the survey process often begins for away from the subject property, and work thein way closer for a variety of reasons. Terry Sundquist, representing Bethel University expressed his appreciation to City Planner Gmdlach for her assistance in the process. Motion by Commissioner Schiterl, seconded by Commissioner Nichols-Matkaifi to dose the Public Hearing. Approved 6-0, the Public Hearing was closed. Chair Howard asked the City Planner it the eastside curb improvement would be on the north side as well. City Planner Gmdlach explained the submitted plans were conceptual, but curbing would potentially be improved on the north side. Commissioner Sehiferl questioned if the applicant would be required to came before the planning commission when it comes time to improve the landscaping. City Planner Gundlach responded landscape improvements would not require council approval. Commissioner Danger asked Mr. Sandquist if additional lighting plans have been submitted. Mr. Sandquist assured Commissioner Danger the lighting will meet required standards. Commissioner Schfferl questioned if a condition could be added to address the lighting plan. City Planner Gundlaeh responded a recommendation could be added, however there is nothing in the Zoning Code that would require a lighting plan. When the applicant obtains their Electrical permit, the lighting plan would be reviewed. Commissioner Danger asked ff the Zoning Code addresses parking lot fighting, City Planner Gmdlach confirmed it does not; however the Building Code may have a requirement Motion by Commissimmr Schffml, seconded by Commissioner Danger to muse a motion to approve Haff recommendation with Ne following changes: