CCP 05-24-2011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RESOLUTION No. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING A PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. WHEREAS, an application for an amendment to an existing Planned Residential Development has been made by SilverCrest Properties LLC to allow construction of a 33 SF wall sign at Meadowood Shores located at 2100 Silver Lake Road, said sign to be erected on the building facade facing Silver Lake Road, and WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. An application for a Planned Residential Development Amendment was made on April 29, 2011. 2. The Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on May 17th and all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard. 3. The Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the request, subject to conditions. 4. The City Council considered the request on May 24, 2011. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and City Council make the following Findings of Fact with respect to the Planned Residential Development Amendment(RD2011-001): 1. The property is located at 2100 Silver Lake Road. 2. The property is zoned B —3, General Business. 3. The property is guided in the New Brighton Comprehensive Plan for CB, Community Business. 4. The property previously received Planned Residential Development and Site Plan approval on April 28, 1998 per Resolution 98-048. 5. The proposed amendment would allow for erection of a 33 SF wall sign on the Silver Lake Road building frontage, when Chapter 9 Zoning Code standards would normally allow a sign on the 27th AVE NW facade as that is the side with legal street frontage. 6. Per the PRD Amendment review criteria of Zoning Code Section 7-110, the PRD standards of Section 7-060 were considered and it was determined none of those standards would be impacted by the proposal to erect a 33 SF sign. 7. Per the PRD Amendment review criteria of Section 7-110, the Planning Commission and City Council also considered whether or not the proposal would be in conformance with the stated principals of Zoning Code Section 7-070(2)(A—G). The Planning Commission and City Council found the proposal to meet these criteria based on the following findings: a. The proposed sign will be placed on the Silver Lake Road frontage, rather than the 27th AVE NW frontage where the property has street frontage and would normally be allowed a wall sign in accordance with Zoning Code Section 9-080(2).