CCP 06-28-2011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Approved Chairperson Howard announced the continuation of the Public Hearing at 6:18 pm. Vince Pellegrin, 1977 Thom Dr. reported he has not been satisfied with the responses he has received from the City. The primary concerns are related to emissions, and stated that the emission test submitted, did not measure any toxic emission. Mr. Pellegrin noted it is his opinion that a stacked velocity test would be a more accurate term for the test which was completed. Additionally it was suggested that the data sheets provided fail to meet the MPCA requirements of 1200 degrees. Mr. Pellegrin expressed concern with the recommendation that the applicant order odor testing as a result of a complaint, as it could be a subjective analysis. Commissioner McPherson clarified the test data may reference a measurement of rankine. Brenda Holden, 1881 Beckman requested the commission include "one animal at a time" as part of the conditions. Also, it was requested the stack height not be allowed to be higher than one foot, if the applicant has only requested six inches. The question of guaranteed maintenance was asked. Brian Jorgenson, 1978 Thom Dr. shared property records near one of the comparable crematories in Green Bay, Wisconsin, indicating the adjacent surrounding properties being owned by the crematory owner. Mr. Jorgenson talked with a MPCA representative regarding a crematory in Duluth, MN, noting the cold weather can cause condensation and fog. Richard Kotoski, property owner at 1998 Thom Dr. requested 12 ft pine trees are planted as opposed to 6 ft pine trees. Mr. Kotoski also asked how odors will be tested. City Planner Gundlach reported there are labs that analyze odors, and prepare an objective analysis, which the City will review and proceed accordingly. Eric Brayden, representing the crematory repair service explained the retort is a smaller unit, with a 200 pound maximum. The minimum temperature for burning correctly is 1600 degrees. Mr. Brayden explained the 3rd party emission test is based on the requirements set forth by the State. It was reported the machine is very efficient, emitting no odors or smoke. Mr. Brayden commented he provides service for the Green Bay crematory; where a day care center is 6 feet to the east of the business. Commissioner McPherson asked Mr. Brayden if he holds a specific license. Mr. Brayden explained he holds a degree in tool and design, as well as military training. Commissioner Danger asked why machines require rebuilding. Mr. Brayden stated it is wear and tear over time. Yince Pellegrin clarified the MPCA is referring to stack temperature, while Mr. Brayden has referenced 1600 degrees secondary chamber temperature. Mr. Brayden explained the probes are in the after chamber(an extension of the secondary chamber.). Commissioner McPherson noted the MPCA requirements address the afterburners, indicating they must maintain a temperature of 1200 degrees for at least .3 seconds. Brian Howard; a Real Estate Broker reported property values can be very subjective. A comparison of similar properties near crematories was completed; the consensus was no variation in property values. It was suggested to plant 6 foot trees, as they tend to grow better. Mr. Kotoski commented he feels the comparison is inaccurate, as it did not address a change of use. Heidi Harten, 3059 16th St NW, representing Paws for Cause reported she deals with people regularly who are looking for a similar place to assist them following the death of their pet. Jane Jorgenson, 1978 Thom Dr. asked if the applicant is willing to negotiate screening options. The applicant, Skip Wyland reported that they will cremate one pet at a time, inviting the public to come in and see the business any time. Odor testing is understood, and the new machines were described as being very good. Mr. Wyland stated Don Nelson, with the MPCA will investigate any complaints. Commissioner Alvey asked the applicant if the recommended hours of operation are acceptable. The other applicant Carol Noren asked what restrictions are placed on the neighboring businesses. 3