My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 08-13-2014
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2014
>
CCP 08-13-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2014 12:12:29 PM
Creation date
8/8/2014 4:11:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
171
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 22, 2014 Page 4 of 7 <br />50 years and having served for at least 10 years. Staff reviewed the history of the Public Safety Department <br />along with the previous "hand shake" agreement for the fire fighters. City Manager Lotter explained that the <br />Council has proposed that the annual levy contribution amount may not need to occur every year. As <br />mentioned previously, when the Fire Relief was changed from a monthly benefit to a lump -sum benefit, the <br />Fund was depleted of assets to a sever degree. The Relief Fund was underfunded to a level below 75 %. <br />Currently, the Fire Relief Fund has performed extremely well. The fund at the end of fiscal year 2013 was <br />funded at a rate of 122 %. Since the Fire Relief Fund was at a healthy level, the Council has questioned <br />whether a municipal contribution should continue to be provided annually. The City Manager recommended <br />that the Council continue to budget the amount of $46,200 into the budget every year. These funds could be <br />redirected if the money wasn't required in the Relief Fund. He recommended that going forward, the Council <br />continue to receive financial information regarding the health of the fund and a copy of the audit report. In <br />addition, the Council should continue to budget a yearly contribution of $46,200. If the Fire Relief Fund was <br />funded by an amount over 100% or better, and no municipal contribution was required, this money shall be <br />redirected to the Community Reinvestment Fund. Regarding the annual benefit, staff recommended that an <br />annual increase to the individual benefit of $500 per year be approved for 2014. There will be no benefit <br />increase requested in 2015. Moving forward, the Fire Relief annual benefit will be increased by $200 with <br />Council approval. A forecasted model of how these changes would impact the Fire Relief Fund was <br />reviewed in detail with the Council. Staff respectfully requested the Council consider approval of a <br />Resolution that would continue the $46,200 contribution annually to the Fire Relief Fund which will be <br />required if the fund was under 100% but will be directed to the Community Reinvestment Fund if the fund <br />was over 100 %. In addition, the Resolution also approves an increase of $500 to the annual benefit for 2014 <br />and no increase in 2015. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen asked if firefighters that retired before the age of 50 could receive a benefit after 10 <br />years of service. City Manager Lotter indicated firefighters under the age of 50 would have to wait to receive <br />their payout until age 50. <br />Councilmember Burg explained he met with City Manager Lotter prior to this meeting to address her <br />questions and requested the different payout scenarios. She thanked staff for the thorough report presented <br />this evening. <br />Councilmember Bauman discussed Relief Associations in Minnesota noting 84 were lump sum and only <br />nine were paid higher than New Brighton's. She credited the Fire Division for their exemplary service to the <br />community but did not support the proposed 9% pay increase. She explained the average pay increase in the <br />metro area was 1.6 1/o. She expressed concern with lump sum pensions and how these were bankrupting <br />communities. She reviewed the amounts received by other departments and believed that the current yearly <br />benefits were fair. She explained she would not be able to support the proposed benefit increases. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen appreciated the homework completed by Councilmember Bauman. He clarified <br />that pensions in St. Anthony differed from New Brighton due to the fact they had more full -time firefighters. <br />He believed that the City's volunteer Fire Division model was working well, that service was excellent and <br />response times were low. It was his opinion that the City would struggle to find well trained volunteers if <br />they were not properly paid. He also thought the current model was a cost benefit to the community, when <br />compared to full -time Fire Departments. He was pleased that the Fire Relief Fund was currently funded at <br />130 %. He explained that he would be supporting star s recommendation. <br />Councilmember Strub reviewed his findings from the State Auditor report. He appreciated the options <br />presented by City Administrator Lotter. He believed the community valued its fire fighters and for this <br />reason, he supported stafFs recommendation. <br />Mayor Jacobsen commented the Fire Division did an outstanding job and provided its member with a high <br />level of training. He questioned how many other departments provided the same level of training to their <br />paid/on-call fire fighters. Fire Fighter Paetzuick discussed the certification and licensure process that all New <br />Brighton fire fighters are required to go through He explained that these requirements were only necessary <br />for full-time firefighters in the State of Minnesota. However, the Public Safety Department believed it to be <br />important enough that this was required of each fire fighter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.