My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 11-25-2014
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2014
>
CCP 11-25-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2014 11:53:44 AM
Creation date
12/5/2014 11:57:44 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Senior Engineering Supervisor position would be downgraded and likely filled by a <br />recent graduate in engineering. This would be an entry level position into the engineering <br />field and likely be a Civil Engineer II position, a previous position in Engineering. <br />Cost Comparison <br />The reorganization will reduce the 2015 proposed budget by nearly $167,213.00, These <br />savings are primarily reflected because of the elimination of a Director level position and <br />the downgrading of the Senior Engineering Supervisor. A cost comparison of the current <br />position costs in the original 2015 budget and the new positions and costs in the amended <br />2015 budget has been attached to this report. These cost savings for the 2015 budget <br />could be higher depending on when the Engineering position discussed in the <br />reorganization is filled. The reduction in the budget will carry over into future years with <br />the only reductions to the number due to the new positions going through the step <br />process. <br />Health Insurance <br />Insurance Committee Discussion <br />The insurance committee met each week after the increases were disclosed to discuss <br />strategies for 2015, The discussion touched on core issues and values including why does <br />the city offer insurance ?, the current health insurance design options, the plans offered, <br />definitions of equity, elimination of the waiver option, and the benefit costs for each <br />choice employees could make, The committee recognized the difficult choices and <br />financial pressures each employee would face with the large increases for 2015. Of <br />particular concern were the premium increases for employees choosing the Family and <br />Single + I option. The committee was asked to communicate these issues and concerns to <br />their respective departments, seek feedback and ideas of fellow employees, and share <br />them with the committee. There was much concern and also much comradery built with <br />employees participating in this discussion and recognizing we are all in this together. The <br />insurance committee worked towards a recommendation they presented to management <br />to bring forward to the Council for possible implementation. <br />Insurance Committee Recommendation <br />The insurance committee felt any options for helping with the health insurance increases <br />should meet three goals; be equitable, be a longer term fix within the current design, and <br />have a solid budget number. The options discussed primarily focused on premium <br />adjustments, flat increases to the health savings accounts, and a matching contribution to <br />employee's health savings accounts. The committee felt a combination of help with <br />premiums and health savings accounts would be best. The recommended option would <br />include a 2015 budget increase for the employer contribution of $61,500 for premium <br />costs and an increase of $55,000 for health savings accounts for a total of $116,500. The <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.