My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015.11.17 Packet Combined
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2015
>
2015.11.17 Packet Combined
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2019 8:58:29 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 4:09:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"(10) Any use established in a Residential, Industrial, or Business District which requires the <br />storage of material or goods shall provide a six foot screen to shield the material or goods <br />from sight by the public traveling on the public right-of-way. Also, if such material or goods <br />extends to a height greater than six feet, it shall be subject to the same yard requirements as a <br />building for the district in which it is located. Material stored in the open shall be in rows no <br />greater than fifty feet in width with access drives not less than eighteen feet between rows." <br />Based on the existing and proposed use of truck and trailer repair and sales, the only items stored <br />outside will be vehicles and trailers. The 2003 approval required a berm and trees along the <br />property line abutting I -35W to meet this standard. However, that berm was never constructed <br />for reasons that are not fully known, creating a nonconformity on site. No additional screening <br />on site was required as no public right-of-ways are visible. <br />The applicant is proposing to maintain the existing green front yard, which contains 2-3 trees. <br />Additionally, the applicant will be creating a green side yard to the north and a green rear yard to <br />the east, abutting the freeway. While these areas are not acting as screening, they are creating <br />small buffer areas that improve the overall aesthetics of the site. <br />In an effort to comply with the screening requirement of Zoning Code Section 6-390(10) <br />abutting the freeway, the applicant is proposing 4 overstory trees and several coniferous shrubs <br />along the eastern, north/south property line. While not a solid screen, staff finds this reasonable <br />based on the following: <br />• The existing outdoor storage of "materials or goods" is being removed from the property, <br />leaving only vehicles and trailers being stored outside. <br />• One could argue the truck and trailer sales stock isn't considered "material or goods" as <br />referenced in the ordinance as all industrial sites have a need to store trucks and trailers of <br />some sort. This could suggest the standard of Section 6-390(10) isn't applicable. <br />• The outdoor storage area's pavement is being improved with new bituminous patched in <br />and seal coated, improving the aesthetics of the lot. <br />• Existing trees and shrubs within MnDOT's right-of-way will remain and provide a <br />minimal buffer as viewed from I -35W. <br />• The applicant's proposed landscaping provides some screening while maintaining sight <br />lines into certain areas of the property for truck and trailer sales stock to be visible. <br />• The 100' electrical transmission line easement that runs parallel to the eastern, <br />north/south property lines makes it difficult to create a full landscaping screen as <br />restrictions on planting exist to protect the transmission lines (the likely reason the <br />original berm and trees were not implemented). <br />No other standards of Section 6-390 apply to the proposal. Staff finds the General Performance <br />Standards of Section 6-390 to be met. <br />Public Safety Comments <br />Public Safety staff reviewed the request and provided no comments. <br />Public Works/Engineering Comments <br />The City Engineer/Public Works Director reviewed the plans and notes that should Rice Creek <br />Watershed District require a permit, that permit should be submitted to the City. At this time, the <br />Rice Creek Watershed District maintains a permit is not required. <br />In conclusion, all Site Plan criteria are met unless otherwise noted and discussed further in this <br />report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.