My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016.11.15 PC Combined
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2016
>
2016.11.15 PC Combined
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2017 11:21:09 AM
Creation date
1/11/2017 11:09:14 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zoning: I – 1, Light Industrial <br /> <br />Surrounding Land Uses: <br /> North: County Road E2, single family homes <br /> South: industrial uses <br /> East: Interstate 35W <br /> West: industrial uses <br />SITE PLAN AMENDMENT ANALYSIS <br />The applicant is requesting an amendment to the amended Site Plan to allow for a larger <br />footprint and elimination of the mezzanine level. This revision more closely aligns the Site Plan <br />with the original request. This revision reduces the overall building square footage from 77,000 <br />SF to 40,436 SF (the originally approved plan was for 45,500 SF). No other Site Plan revisions <br />are proposed. This revision affects the following site plan standards: <br /> <br />Building Setbacks <br />Section 6- <br />060(1-4) <br />Required Existing Original <br />Proposal <br />June Revision Proposed <br />Front (north) 60’ 130’ 110’ 110’ 110’ <br />Rear (south) 20’ 45’ 650’ 650’ 600’ <br />Side (east) 15’ 200’ 250’ 230’ 250’ <br />Side (west) 15’ 47’ 120’ 15’ 115’ <br /> <br />The proposed amendment results in setbacks very similar to the original proposal. All minimum <br />setbacks are met. <br /> <br />Floor Area Ratio <br />Section 6-060(5) Allowed Existing Original <br />Proposal <br />June <br />Revision <br />Proposed <br />One-Story <br />Construction <br />0.4 0.12 0.18 0.24 .17 <br /> <br />The floor area ratio has decreased from the previous proposal and is more similar to the original <br />application, far below the maximum of 0.4. <br /> <br />Building Height <br />Section 6-060 (6) Allowed Original <br />Proposal <br />June Revision Proposed <br />Existing 40’ 11’ 11’ 11’ <br />Proposed 40’ 14’ 22’ 14’* <br />*the corner feature near the main entrance rises to 18’ <br /> <br />The proposed elevations illustrate a nearly identical building to the original proposal with a total <br />height well below the maximum allowance of 40’. <br /> <br />Required # of Parking Stalls <br />Chapter 11 of the Zoning Code does not list a parking ratio that is applicable to a self-storage <br />use. Chapter 11, Section 11-040(4) states that other uses not specifically mentioned may be
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.