My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017.07.25 WS Agenda C
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2017
>
2017.07.25 WS Agenda C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2018 5:29:16 PM
Creation date
1/4/2018 11:12:54 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Redevelopment ideas on old Highway 8 were well received for the most part. Discussion items <br />included: <br />o What happens with businesses that are currently there and the uses they provide…can <br />they be retained? <br />o What is meant by a “road diet” along Highway 8? <br />o How much development could the concepts accommodate and is there a market for it? <br />Maybe discuss how it could occur in a phased approach. <br />o Two approaches – one more proactive (city takes a more active role in facilitating <br />change – i.e. master planning vs. one more reactive where city re-guides and up-zones <br />parcel but lets the market place drive the master planning). <br />• Revitalization along Silver Lake Road <br />o Exploring both reinvestment and site improvements vs. more intensive infill and <br />redevelopment seemed appropriate. There was a tendency to think that redevelopment <br />and infill/intensifying the nodes might not be supported but worthy of discussion. <br />o Discussion was had on applying the concept of revitalization/reinvestment at other <br />nodes along Silver Lake Road. <br />• Many questions regarding implementation, including: <br />o What funding sources are there for these ideas? <br />o Are there unique structural/organizational approaches to funding (i.e. “friends of parks” <br />for example)? <br />o Volunteer programs to help with the distribution of workload. <br />o Can we identify the “low hanging fruit” as easy starting points? <br />o A diagram that shows how the redevelopment process or entitlement process would <br />help with understanding that “concept” nature of plans and the necessary next steps to <br />implementation. <br /> <br />Staff is looking for additional feedback and comment from Council regarding this content. To aid in the <br />discussion, HKGi will provide an updated presentation during the work session. The next step is to <br />launch more generalized policy and idea cards at Stockyard Days, should Council accept these ideas and <br />concept for greater public consumption. Staff looks forward to a good discussion!
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.