My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017.09.12 CC Agenda C
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2017
>
2017.09.12 CC Agenda C
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2018 5:29:16 PM
Creation date
1/5/2018 4:46:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2018 Budget Workshop <br />Lotter stated staff had a presentation on the 2018 Budget based on the Council’s previous discussions. <br /> <br />Davitt presented the Council with an updated 2018 Budget commenting on the plans for City streets. She <br />stated LGA would be used for the City’s street program in 2018, but noted after 2019 LGA would not be <br />placed in the streets fund. She explained there would be an election in 2018 and this expense was placed in the <br />budget. She reviewed several cost savings measures staff has been pursuing along with new revenue streams. <br />She proposed the two new FTE’s be hired in June versus January, which would save the City $50,000. It was <br />noted this would reduce the levy to 9.42%. If the Council were to put an additional $100,000 of LGA into the <br />General Fund, the levy would be reduced to 8.16%. She reviewed the proposed budgets and levies for <br />neighboring communities and reported New Brighton was still on the low end. Staff discussed the next steps <br />for the budget and tax levy and encouraged the Council to support the original budget. <br /> <br />Lotter reviewed a recent wage study noting non-union staff was slightly below average when evaluated against <br />12 comparable communities. He provided further comment on the Council’s goals and how the proposed <br />budget would meet those directives. <br /> <br />Councilmember Burg discussed how the budget and tax levy were being shared over a larger pool of taxpayers <br />than in the past given the recent development that has occurred in the City. She thanked staff for presenting <br />the Council with options to reduce the levy. She believed these were great ideas that would assist the Cou ncil <br />in accomplishing their goals. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jacobsen stated he appreciated staff’s presentation as well. He believed the recommendations <br />from staff made a lot of sense. He supported the Council putting half of the LGA into the General Fund in <br />2018. He anticipated staff was somewhat conservative on its income projections for the coming year with <br />respect to the Eagle’s Nest, given the fact this will be a newly renovated attraction for the community. <br /> <br />Councilmember Bauman thanked staff for presenting several cost saving options to the Council. She liked <br />these kinds of ideas. She understood the Council’s goal was to be debt free while also keeping property taxes <br />in check. She agreed that revenue streams could be more closely looked at for the coming year. She believed <br />the budget was moving in the right direction but was frustrated to see that costs were still not being cut. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strub believed the 2018 budget reflected Council directives which closely reflected <br />community priorities. He stated the Council was not requesting hockey rinks or splash pads, or anything else <br />extraordinary. He explained the Council was proposing a budget that would properly maintain the City. He <br />questioned what areas of the budget should be cut. <br /> <br />Councilmember Bauman did not believe it was necessary for the City Council to go line by line to make cuts <br />within the budget. She explained this work could be done by staff based on direction received from the <br />Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strub believed the Council’s directive was to provide services based on the needs of our <br />residents and the tax capacity available. He stated he didn’t understand what type of cuts Councilmember <br />Bauman was proposing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Bauman commented on LGA and how it was supposed to be utilized by the City to lower <br />levies or be passed back to residents. <br /> <br />Mayor Johnson stated she would have to agree to disagree with Councilmember Bauman on this topic. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.