My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017.11.14 CC
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2017
>
2017.11.14 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/5/2018 5:29:16 PM
Creation date
1/5/2018 5:16:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Bauman requested further information on how the program worked and the City’s role. Mr. <br />Freudaman indicated the City would help him introduce the program through the public awareness campaign <br />letter that would be sent out in a City envelope. He explained that all billing for the program would be done <br />through the National League of Cities and would not be managed by the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Johnson questioned how the royalty program worked. Mr. Freudaman described how the royalty <br />program was established. <br /> <br />Councilmember Burg asked what the costs were for a sewer or water line replacement. Mr. Freudaman <br />explained the program would c over up to $8,500 for the repair or replacement of a water or sewer line. He <br />noted this also included having the line rooted out. He reported this program was only being offered to <br />residential homeowners at this time. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the repair services offered through this program and how they would be <br />administered by the National League of Cities. <br /> <br />Mayor Johnson inquired if homeowner’s insurance typically covered the cost of a sewer line replacement. Mr. <br />Freudaman stated typically this was not covered by homeowner’s insurance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strub questioned what the participation rate was for cities involved in this program. Mr. <br />Freudaman stated this would depend on how long the program has been rolled out. He estimated during the <br />first year there was only a 7% to 10% pick up rate. He indicated this would increase over time. Schlichting <br />commented on the number of homes that would be prime candidates for this program. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jacobsen asked how this program differed from the program the City already had in place. <br />Davitt reported the existing program protected homeowners from any backups and property damage within <br />their homes. She indicated the City’s program would dovetail nicely with the proposed service line program. <br /> <br />Mayor Johnson inquired if there was a downside to the program. Mr. Freudaman stated he had a large number <br />of partners with a 96% satisfaction rate. He indicated his call centers were all US based and were very prompt <br />with responses. He explained the National League of Cities has been working diligently to negate any down <br />sides to this program. He understood that issues can arise but are dealt with in a timely manner. <br /> <br />Mayor Johnson questioned if residents would have to sign up for a certain period of t ime. Mr. Freudaman <br />stated there were no time restraints within the program. <br /> <br />Councilmember Burg asked how much the price for the coverage has changed over the last decade. Mr. <br />Freudaman reported the pricing was very stable and noted he has not seen an increase in the past two years. <br />He stated the more people that participate the better the price point. <br /> <br />Councilmember Bauman inquired if homeowners typically purchased one or more of the products. Mr. <br />Freudaman explained his customers, on average, had 1.5 products. He encouraged the City to offer all three <br />products for their residents. <br /> <br />Council consensus was to direct staff to bring this item back to the Council for further consideration. <br /> <br />Comprehensive Plan Update – Phase 2 Community Engagement <br />Gundlach provided the Council with an update on Phase 2 of the Comprehensive Plan with respect to <br />community engagement. She was pleased to report the City has received a great deal of feedback from the <br />public both at Stockyard Days and through the recent community survey. She commented on some of the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.