Laserfiche WebLink
Minor Subdivision, SUP, and Site Plan Review; Silver Lake Smile <br />City Council Report; 8-28-18 <br /> <br /> <br />Page 13 <br />(cont.) <br />2. That the special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other <br />property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor <br />substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. <br />Staff Comment: The architecture of the new building should enhance the area and <br />will not impact the use on adjacent lands. In general, investments like this tend to <br />have a positive economic impact on surrounding properties. Criteria met. <br />3. That the establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly <br />development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in <br />the district. <br />Staff Comment: The Palmer Overlay District specifically provides the <br />opportunity for buildings to be closer to the road than 30 feet, and the footprint as <br />proposed will not impact surrounding redevelopment should such occur. Criteria <br />met. <br />4. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have <br />been or are being provided. <br />Staff Comment: While the Engineering memo dated 8/7/18 has a number of <br />conditions that must be met including working with MnDOLI on connection <br />issues, no issues were identified that would preclude the proposed development. <br />Criteria met. <br />5. That the special use shall in all other respects conform to the applicable <br />regulations of the district in which it is located. <br />Staff Comment: The plans as drawn up appear to meet all other requirements of <br />the B-3 zoning district and/or the Palmer Overlay District. Criteria met. <br /> <br />Additional <br />Information: <br /> None <br /> <br />Engineering <br />Review: <br /> The Engineering review memo dated 8/7/18 is attached to this report. <br /> <br />Public <br />Comment: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Joshua Jacat (1237 10th St NW, #103) – strongly supports the proposed design. Feels <br />the city as a whole has a lot of development that is not unique or interesting. Agrees <br />with the architect that bringing in something unique and stands out will improve the <br />area. Wants the City to have some character, and wants to see this design built. <br />