2020.09.15 Planning Commission - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Site Plan Review: Valtinson Financial_388 Cleveland Avenue Planning Commission Report; 9-15-20 Page 6 6. Surface parking lots adding 50+ stalls meet specific requirements; Standard not applicable. 7. Heightened screening required when commercial and industrial uses is adjacent to a residential use. Berms, fences, or walls are acceptable. Aerial photos show the property already has existing fencing between it and the adjacent residential property – standard met Lot Access:  The access point to the property will not change from existing conditions. Engineering: Engineering reviewed the plans and had the following comment:  Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall submit updated drainage calculations and any other information deemed necessary by the City Engineer to show that all stormwater management regulations are being met by the proposed new construction. Signage  The applicant is not proposing any new signs on the new garage. Fire/Safety:  Plans need to show more detail regarding the intent of the proposed westerly facing garage door. If it’s just there to allow for airflow to the indoor recreational area and not for vehicular traffic, that’ll work. If it’s intended for vehicular use, plans must be approved by engineering to show how traffic flow to and from that door will work. Parking & Traffic:  The new additional indoor parking will largely make up for lost surface parking stalls, and the existing surface lot could also be restriped, if needed, to create enough defined parking to meet minimum requirements. No further analysis was deemed necessary. Sidewalks & Trails:  There are no sidewalks along the County Road, and nothing more than on-street wide shoulders planned for the area. No actions necessary.